Hanna v. Chudy et al
Filing
55
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 52 Motion for Extension of Time to File (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TIMOTHY HANNA,
12
13
14
v.
J. CHUDY, et al.,
15
Case No. CV 11-0862 LHK (PR)
Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS ELLIS AND CHUDY’S
MOTION TO CHANGE TIME TO FILE
DISPOSITIVE MOTION
Defendants.
16
17
On August 12, 2012, the Court ordered service of Plaintiff Hanna’s complaint on
18
Defendants Chudy, Ellis, Foston, and Hammond. The Court ordered Defendants to answer the
19
complaint and file any dispositive motion within 90 days (calculated to be November 13, 2012).
20
(Order of Service 5.)
21
22
Defendants Ellis and Chudy requested a sixty-day extension of time, up to and including
January 14, 2013, to file a dispositive motion.
23
The Court has read and considered Defendants’ request and the accompanying declaration
24
of counsel, and finds good cause exists to grant the request. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that
25
Defendants’ request is GRANTED.
26
Plaintiff Hanna’s opposition to Defendants’ dispositive motion shall be filed with the Court
27
and served upon Defendants no later than twenty-eight days after Defendants serve Plaintiff with
28
1
[Proposed] Order Granting Mot. Change Time (CV 11-0862 LHK (PR))
1
the motion. Defendants shall file a reply brief within fourteen days of the date on which Plaintiff
2
serves Defendants with the opposition. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the
3
reply brief is due. No hearing will be held on the motion unless the Court so orders at a later date.
4
5
6
11/8/12
Dated: ______________________
_______________________________
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[Proposed] Order Granting Mot. Change Time (CV 11-0862 LHK (PR))
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?