Low v. Linkedin Corporation

Filing 39

Statement of Recent Decision by Linkedin Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Frankel, Simon) (Filed on 2/29/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

SIMON J. FRANKEL (State Bar No. 171552)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
MALI B. FRIEDMAN (State Bar No. 247514)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
One Front Street, 35th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
LINKEDIN CORPORATION

7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN JOSE DIVISION

12
13

KEVIN LOW, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated,

14
Plaintiff,
15
vs.

Civil Case No.: CV 11-01468 LHK
DEFENDANT LINKEDIN
CORPORATION’S STATEMENT OF
RECENT DECISION
(N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 7-3(d)(2))

16
17
18

LINKEDIN CORPORATION, a California
Corporation, and Does 1 to 50 inclusive,
Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DEFENDANT LINKEDIN CORPORATION’S STATEMENT
OF RECENT DECISION

Civil Case No.: CV 11-01468 LHK

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(d)(2), defendant LinkedIn Corporation hereby

2

files this Statement of Recent Decision to bring to the Court’s attention In re Facebook Privacy

3

Litigation, No. 5:10-cv-02389-JW, Dkt. No. 115 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2012) (attached as Exhibit

4

1). The decision was published on the same day that LinkedIn filed its Reply in Support of

5

Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 38).

6

This decision is relevant to the issues addressed in Sections III(B)(1)(a), (c)

7

(pages 11-12, 14-15) of LinkedIn’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 34)

8

and Sections II(B)(1), (2) (pages 4-8) of LinkedIn’s Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss

9

Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 38).

10
11

DATED: February 29, 2012

12

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
By:

13
14

/s/
Mali B. Friedman
Attorneys for Defendant
LINKEDIN CORPORATION

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DEFENDANT LINKEDIN CORPORATION’S STATEMENT
OF RECENT DECISION

1

Civil Case No.: CV 11-01468 LHK