Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1000
OPPOSITION to ( #999 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Opposition to Apple's Motion to Strike Portions of Samsung's Expert Reports) (Public Redacted Version) filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Denying Apple's Motion to Strike)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 5/31/2012) Modified text on 6/4/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
10 APPLE INC., a California corporation,
11
12
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG
Plaintiff,
vs.
13 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
14 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
15 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
16
Defendants.
17
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
APPLE’S MOTION TO STRIKE
PORTIONS OF SAMSUNG'S EXPERT
REPORTS
18
19
On May 17, 2012, Plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) filed a Motion To Strike Portions of
20 Samsung's Expert Reports (Docket No. 939). Samsung filed its Opposition to this motion on
21 May 31, 2012
22
Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, and having
23 found no good cause therefor, the Court hereby DENIES Apple's Motion To Strike Portions of
24 Samsung's Expert Reports in its entirety.
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4782001.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF
SAMSUNG'S EXPERT REPORTS
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3 DATED:
______________________
4
5
6
HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4782001.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF
SAMSUNG'S EXPERT REPORTS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?