Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1000

OPPOSITION to ( #999 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Opposition to Apple's Motion to Strike Portions of Samsung's Expert Reports) (Public Redacted Version) filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Denying Apple's Motion to Strike)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 5/31/2012) Modified text on 6/4/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 11 12 CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG Plaintiff, vs. 13 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG 14 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG 15 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 16 Defendants. 17 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF SAMSUNG'S EXPERT REPORTS 18 19 On May 17, 2012, Plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) filed a Motion To Strike Portions of 20 Samsung's Expert Reports (Docket No. 939). Samsung filed its Opposition to this motion on 21 May 31, 2012 22 Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, and having 23 found no good cause therefor, the Court hereby DENIES Apple's Motion To Strike Portions of 24 Samsung's Expert Reports in its entirety. 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/4782001.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG -1[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF SAMSUNG'S EXPERT REPORTS 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 DATED: ______________________ 4 5 6 HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/4782001.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG -2[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF SAMSUNG'S EXPERT REPORTS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?