Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 102

Declaration of AUSTIN TARANGO in Support of #101 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel BRIDGES & MAVRAKAKIS LLP filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11)(Related document(s) #101 ) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 7/11/2011)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 1 quinn emanuel trial lawyers I silicon valley 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor, Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 I TEL: (650) 801-5000 FAX: (650) 801-5100 WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NO. (650) 801-5022 WRITER'S INTERNET ADDRESS victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com June 27, 2011 VIA E-MAIL Kenneth H. Bridges, Esq. Partner Bridges & Mavrakakis 3000 El Camino Real One Palo Alto Square, 2nd Floor Palo Alto, CA 94306 Re: Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Case No. 11-cv-1846-LHK (N.D. Cal.) Dear Mr. Bridges: I write to request information regarding your appearance as counsel for Apple in this matter on June 16, 2011. It has come to our attention that you and other attorneys at Bridges & Mavrakakis, previously represented Samsung in multiple prior matters. In fact, you tout these prior representations on your finn website, such as the Samsung v. Ericsson litigations. Based solely on billing records submitted by you and the other Bridges & Mavrakakis attorneys, one or more of these prior representations are clearly substantially related to the above referenced matter. For example, the Ericsson case dealt with Samsung technology relating to mobile devices, which is at the heart of Apple's current lawsuit. Through this prior representation, you gained access to Samsung's confidential information on a wide range of topics that are relevant to this current litigation. As you are aware, an attorney may not "without the informed written consent of the client or former client, accept employment adverse to the client or former client where, by reason of the representation of the client or former client, the member has obtained confidential information Quinn emanuel urquhart & sullivan, Ilp LOS ANGELES 1865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 1 TEL (213) 443-3000 FAx (213) 443-3100 NEW YORK 151 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, New York 10010-1601 I TEL (212) 849-7000 FAX (212) 849-7100 SAN FRANCISCO 150 California Street, 22nd Floor, San Francisco, California 94111-4788 I TEL (415) 875-6600 FAX (415) 875-6700 CHICAG01500 W. Madison Street, Suite 2450, Chicago, Illinois 60661-2510 I TEL (312) 705-7400 FAX (312) 705-7401 LONDON116 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7EG, United Kingdom 1 TEL +44(0) 20 7653 2000 FAX +44(0) 20 7653 2100 TOKYO 1NBF Hibiya Bldg., 25F, 1-1-7, Uchisaiwai-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0011, Japan I TEL +81 3 5510 1711 FAX +81 3 5510 1712 IvIANNHE1M1Erzbergerstralle 5, 68165 Mannheim, Germany I TEL +49(0) 621 43298 6000 FAX +49(0) 621 43298 6100 material to the employment." Cal. Rules of Profl Conduct 3-310(E). Here, neither you, nor any other attorneys at Bridges & Mavrakakis have received Samsung's consent to represent Apple in this matter. Because the subject matter of the previous litigations and this litigation are substantially related, your access to confidential information is presumed and this knowledge is imputed to your entire firm. Flatt v. Superior Court, 9 Cal. 4th 275, 283 (1994). Your successive representations of Samsung and Apple are a matter of great concern to Samsung. In light of these serious issues, we request a meet and confer, no later than June 29th to discuss the following issues: • Information regarding your, and any other attorneys' at Bridges & Mavrakakis, involvement with any past representations of Samsung. • Whether any Samsung confidential information gained during these representations has been shared with Apple, Morrison & Foerster, or Wilmer Hale. • If you contend that these past representations are not substantially related, all bases for this contention. • Bridges & Mavrakakis' role in the current litigation, including for example, amount of time billed, subject matter of time spent, etc. • Apple's knowledge of these prior representations. We appreciate your prompt cooperation on this matter. While we would prefer to resolve this matter without the need for judicial intervention, Samsung expressly reserves all of its rights therein. Very truly yours, Ao r Victoria F. Maroulis VFM cc: Mr. Jason Bartlett, Morrison & Foerster 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?