Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1024

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Declaration Of Dr. Karan Singh, Ph.D. In Support Of Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment, #3 Singh Decl. Ex. 1, #4 Singh Decl. Ex. 2, #5 Singh Decl. Ex. 3, #6 Singh Decl. Ex. 4, #7 Singh Decl. Ex. 5, #8 Singh Decl. Ex. 6, #9 Singh Decl. Ex. 7, #10 Singh Decl. Ex. 8, #11 Singh Decl. Ex. 9, #12 Singh Decl. Ex. 10, #13 Declaration Of Ravin Balakrishnan, Ph.D. In Support Of Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment, #14 Balakrishnan Decl. Ex. 1, #15 Balakrishnan Decl. Ex. 2, #16 Balakrishnan Decl. Ex. 3)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 6/1/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781) hmcelhinny@mofo.com MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368) jtaylor@mofo.com ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363) atucher@mofo.com RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) rhung@mofo.com JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530) jasonbartlett@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 WILLIAM F. LEE william.lee@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180) mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 10 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN JOSE DIVISION 15 16 17 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Plaintiff, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL RE APPLE’S OPPOSITION TO SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. 25 26 27 28 APPLE’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL RE OPP. TO SAMSUNG’S MOT. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK sf-3150843 1 2 3 4 5 In accordance with Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, and General Order No. 62, Apple Inc. (“Apple”) submits this motion for an order to seal the following documents or portions thereof: 1. The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of Ravin Balakrishnan, Ph.D. in Support of Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment; 2. The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of Dr. Karan Singh, Ph.D. 6 in Support of Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Singh 7 Declaration”) and Exhibits 1, 2, and 8 thereto; and 8 9 10 3. The Declaration of Terry L. Musika in Support of Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Musika Declaration”) and Exhibits A through L thereto. 11 Exhibit 1 to the Singh Declaration and Exhibits A-E, H, and I to the Musika Declaration 12 contain information that is highly confidential as set out in the Declaration of Cyndi Wheeler in 13 Support of Apple’s Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal (“Wheeler 14 Declaration”) (Dkt. No. 998). It is Apple’s policy not to disclose or describe to third parties its 15 confidential financial, design, trade secrets, or product development information. (Wheeler 16 Declaration ¶ 11.) The Apple-confidential material in these exhibits relate to such confidential 17 information, as detailed in the Wheeler Declaration. (Id. ¶ 1-10.) This information is highly 18 confidential to Apple and could be used by Apple’s competitors to Apple’s disadvantage if 19 disclosed publicly. (Id. ) The relief requested in this motion is necessary and is narrowly tailored 20 to protect confidential information, focusing only on specific portions of the documents at issue. 21 (Id. ¶ 14.) 22 Exhibits 1, 2, and 8 to the Singh Declaration and Exhibits B, C, F-H and J-L to the Musika 23 Declaration contain materials that Samsung has designated as confidential under the protective 24 order entered in this case. Apple expects that, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d), Samsung will 25 file a declaration seeking to establish good cause to permit the sealing of these materials. In 26 addition, the Musika Declaration and Exhibits A-L thereto contain highly confidential damages- 27 28 APPLE’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL RE OPP. TO SAMSUNG’S MOT. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK sf-3150843 1 1 related expert materials, which the parties have stipulated should be submitted to the Court under 2 seal and not placed on the public record. (Wheeler Decl. ¶ 12.) 3 Finally, to the extent the above-referenced Declarations refer to or discuss the above- 4 referenced confidential materials, or the confidential materials identified in the Wheeler 5 Declaration, they could be used to Apple’s disadvantage by competitors if they were not filed 6 under seal, for the same reasons. (Id. ¶ 13.) 7 8 9 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-(c), Apple will lodge with the Clerk the documents at issue with the sealable portions highlighted. 10 11 Dated: May 31, 2012 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 12 13 14 15 By: /s/ Michael A. Jacobs MICHAEL A. JACOBS Attorneys for Plaintiff APPLE INC. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 APPLE’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL RE OPP. TO SAMSUNG’S MOT. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK sf-3150843 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?