Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1033

*** FILED IN ERROR. REFER TO DOCUMENT #1035 . *** Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Public Opposition to Motion for Leave to Seek Reconsideration of May 21, 2012 Order, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Declaration of Grant L. Kim in Support of Opposition, #5 Exhibit A to Public Kim Declaration, #6 Exhibit B to Public Kim Declaration, #7 Exhibit C to Public Kim Declaration, #8 Exhibit D to Public Kim Declaration)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 6/4/2012) Modified on 6/5/2012 (fff, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 APPLE INC., a California corporation, Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 17 18 19 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SEEK RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S MAY 21, 2012 ORDER (DKT. NO. 978-1) Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOT. FOR RECON. CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG) sf-3154505 1 The Court having considered the supporting and opposing papers submitted in connection 2 with Samsung’s Motion for Leave to Seek Reconsideration of the Court’s May 21, 2012 Order 3 (Dkt. No. 978-1), 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 5 Samsung’s Motion for Leave to Seek Reconsideration of the Court’s May 21, 2012 Order 6 (Dkt. No. 978-1) is DENIED. 7 8 9 10 Dated: _____________ Honorable Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE FO FILE MOT. FOR RECON. CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG) sf-3154505 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?