Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1033
*** FILED IN ERROR. REFER TO DOCUMENT #1035 . *** Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Public Opposition to Motion for Leave to Seek Reconsideration of May 21, 2012 Order, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Declaration of Grant L. Kim in Support of Opposition, #5 Exhibit A to Public Kim Declaration, #6 Exhibit B to Public Kim Declaration, #7 Exhibit C to Public Kim Declaration, #8 Exhibit D to Public Kim Declaration)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 6/4/2012) Modified on 6/5/2012 (fff, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16
17
18
19
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
SEEK RECONSIDERATION OF THE
COURT’S MAY 21, 2012 ORDER (DKT.
NO. 978-1)
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOT. FOR RECON.
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3154505
1
The Court having considered the supporting and opposing papers submitted in connection
2
with Samsung’s Motion for Leave to Seek Reconsideration of the Court’s May 21, 2012 Order
3
(Dkt. No. 978-1),
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
5
Samsung’s Motion for Leave to Seek Reconsideration of the Court’s May 21, 2012 Order
6
(Dkt. No. 978-1) is DENIED.
7
8
9
10
Dated: _____________
Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE FO FILE MOT. FOR RECON.
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3154505
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?