Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1042

OPPOSITION to ( #968 MOTION Rule 37 Sanctions re December 22, 2011 Court Order ) filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 6/5/2012) Modified text on 6/6/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12

APPLE INC., a California corporation,

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)

13
Plaintiff,
14
v.

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR RULE 37
SANCTIONS (DKT. NO. 968)

15
16
17
18
19

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,

Date:
Time:
Place:
Judge:

June 21, 2012
10:00 a.m.
Courtroom 5, 4th Floor
Hon. Paul S. Grewal

Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR RULE 37 SANCTIONS (DKT. NO. 968)
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3155045

1

The Court having considered the supporting and opposing papers submitted in connection

2

with Samsung’s Motion for Rule 37 Sanctions (Dkt. No. 968), as well as the arguments made by

3

counsel, and GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN,

4

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

5

Samsung’s Motion for Rule 37 Sanctions (Dkt. No. 968) is DENIED.

6
7
8
9

Dated: _____________
Honorable Paul S. Grewal
United States Magistrate Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR RULE 37 SANCTIONS (DKT. NO. 968)
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3155045

1