Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1044

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Reply In Support of Motion For Clarification of May 4, 2012 Order filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: #1 Samsung's Reply In Support of Motion For Clarification of May 4, 2012 Order, #2 Declaration of Dr. Jeffrey Johnson, #3 Exhibit 1 to Johnson Declaration, #4 Declaration of Mark Tung, #5 Exhibit 1, #6 Exhibit 2, #7 Exhibit 3)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 6/5/2012)

EXHIBIT 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
[e-mail]
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
[e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10
11
12

WILLIAM F. LEE
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.

13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN JOSE DIVISION
17
18
19

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,

20
21
22
23
24
25

v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,

Case No.

11-cv-01846-LHK

APPLE INC.’S SECOND
AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSE TO SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.’S
INTERROGATORY NO. 5 TO
APPLE INC.

Defendants.

26
27
28
APPLE’S SECOND AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSE TO SAMSUNG’S INTERROGATORY NO. 5

1

Under Rules 26 and 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 33, Apple

2

Inc. (“Apple”) hereby amends it objections and response to Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.’s

3

Interrogatory No. 5 served by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“Samsung”) on August 3, 2011.

4
5

GENERAL OBJECTIONS
The General Objections set forth in Apple’s Objections and Responses to Samsung’s First

6

Set of Interrogatories, served on September 12, 2011, are incorporated herein by reference.

7

AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 5

8

Subject to the foregoing qualifications and General Objections and the specific objections

9

made below, Apple objects and responds to Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.’s Interrogatory No. 5

10

to Apple Inc. as follows:

11

INTERROGATORY NO. 5:

12

Separately for each of the APPLE PATENTS-IN-SUIT, APPLE TRADE DRESS and

13

APPLE TRADEMARKS, IDENTIFY every product manufactured, used, sold, offered for sale, or

14

imported into the United States since 2005 that YOU believe uses or may use any protected

15

design, trademark, trade dress, or invention of the APPLE PATENTS-IN-SUIT, APPLE TRADE

16

DRESS, and APPLE TRADEMARKS and the date(s) on which you believe that use occurred.

17

The products shall be identified by product name, product manufacturer, telecommunications

18

carrier (if applicable), date of product announcement, date of product release, and appearance of

19

product – including front, back, and side images.

20

SECOND AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 5:

21

Apple objects to the phrase “appearance of product” as vague and ambiguous. Apple

22

objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad, unduly burdensome, and not reasonably calculated to

23

lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, especially to the extent it requests: (i) “every

24

product,” including products not at issue in this litigation; (ii) the production of objects or images

25

in response to an Interrogatory; (iii) information concerning the “appearance of product –

26

including front, back, and side images”; and (iv) Samsung products released outside of the United

27

States. Apple further objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information that: (i)

28

requires the disclosure of information, documents, and things protected from disclosure by the
APPLE’S SECOND AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S INTERROGATORY NO. 5

1

1

attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, common interest doctrine, joint defense

2

privilege, or any other applicable privilege, doctrine, or immunity; (ii) would require Apple to

3

draw a legal conclusion to respond; (iii) is outside of Apple’s possession, custody, or control; (iv)

4

can be obtained as easily by Samsung, is already in Samsung’s possession, or is publicly

5

available; (v) concerns use of any asserted trademark or trade dress before 2007; (vi) would

6

require Apple to draw a legal conclusion to respond; or (vii) is subject to a confidentiality or

7

nondisclosure agreement or governed by a protective order preventing its production.

8
9
10
11

Subject to and incorporating its General Objections and its specific objections, Apple
responds as follows with respect to the Samsung products accused in Apple’s Amended
Complaint:
At least the following Samsung devices use or may use inventions claimed by the ‘002,

12

‘891, ‘163, ‘915, and ‘828 patents: Acclaim, Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G,

13

Exhibit 4G, Fascinate, Galaxy Ace, Galaxy Prevail, Galaxy S (i9000), Galaxy S 4G, Galaxy S 2

14

(AT&T; i9100; T-Mobile; Epic 4G Touch; Skyrocket), Galaxy S Showcase (i500), Galaxy Tab

15

7.0, Galaxy Tab 10.1, Gem, Gravity Smart, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Intercept, Mesmerize, Nexus S,

16

Nexus S 4G, Replenish, Sidekick, Transform, and Vibrant.

17

At least the following Samsung devices use or may use inventions claimed by the ‘381

18

patent: Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Exhibit 4G, Fascinate, Galaxy Ace,

19

Galaxy Prevail, Galaxy S (i9000), Galaxy S 4G, Galaxy S 2 (Epic 4G Touch), Gravity Smart,

20

Indulge, Infuse 4G, Intercept, Mesmerize, Nexus S, Nexus S 4G, Replenish, Sidekick, Vibrant,

21

Galaxy Tab 7.0, and Galaxy Tab 10.1.

22
23
24
25

At least the following Samsung devices use or may use inventions claimed by the ‘607
and ‘129 patents: Galaxy Tab 7.0 and Galaxy Tab 10.1.
At least the following Samsung devices use or may use the invention claimed by the
D’889 patent: Galaxy Tab 10.1.

26

At least the following Samsung devices use or may use the inventions claimed by the

27

D’087, D’677, and D’270 patents: Fascinate, Galaxy Ace, Galaxy S i9000, Galaxy S2 i9100,

28
APPLE’S SECOND AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S INTERROGATORY NO. 5

2

1

Galaxy S 4G, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, Galaxy S Showcase (i500), Vibrant, Galaxy S2 Epic 4G

2

Touch, Galaxy S2 (T-Mobile), Galaxy S2 (AT&T), and Galaxy S2 Skyrocket.

3

At least the following Samsung devices use or may use the inventions claimed by the

4

D’790, D’305, and D’334 patents: Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Fascinate,

5

Gem, Galaxy S i9000, Galaxy S 4G, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, Galaxy S Showcase (i500),

6

and Vibrant.

7

At least the Samsung Vibrant, Mesmerize, Infuse 4G, Galaxy S 4G, Fascinate, Galaxy S2

8

i9100, Galaxy S2 Epic 4G Touch, Galaxy S2 (AT&T), Galaxy S2 (T-Mobile), Galaxy S2

9

Skyrocket, Captivate, Galaxy Ace, Galaxy S i9000, Droid Charge, Continuum, Epic 4G, Galaxy

10

Prevail, and Galaxy S Showcase (i500) products use or may use a combination of elements from

11

Apple’s Original iPhone Trade Dress, iPhone 3G Trade Dress, iPhone 4 Trade Dress, iPhone

12

Trade Dress; the trade dress shown in the Trade Dress Registrations; and the trade dress shown in

13

U.S. Application Serial No. 85/299,118. Apple alleges that at least the Samsung Vibrant,

14

Acclaim, Galaxy S Showcase (i500), Mesmerize, Infuse 4G, Indulge, Intercept, Galaxy S i9000,

15

Galaxy S 4G, Galaxy Ace, Galaxy Prevail, Fascinate, Gem, Gravity Smart, Epic 4G, Exhibit 4G,

16

Droid Charge, Continuum, Captivate, Galaxy S2 i9100, Galaxy S2 Epic 4G Touch, Galaxy S2

17

(AT&T), Galaxy S2 (T-Mobile), Galaxy S2 Skyrocket, Galaxy S i9000, Galaxy Tab 7.0, Galaxy

18

Tab 7.0 Plus, Galaxy Tab 10.1 products use or may use icons that infringe the Registered Icon

19

Trademarks, the Purple iTunes Store Trademark, and the iTunes Eighth Note and CD Design

20

Trademark. Apple alleges that at least the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Galaxy Tab 7.0, and Galaxy Tab 7.0

21

Plus use or may use a combination of elements from the iPad Trade Dress and the iPad 2 Trade

22

Dress; and the trade dress shown in U.S. Application Serial Nos. 77/921,838, 77/921,829, and

23

77/921,869. Apple alleges that at least the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Galaxy Tab 7.0, and Galaxy Tab 7.0

24

Plus use or may use icons that infringe the Registered Icon Trademarks, the Purple iTunes Store

25

Trademark, and the iTunes Eighth Note and CD Design Trademark. Apple believes that the use

26

or possible use of its patented inventions, trade dress, and trademarks occurred, for each product

27

listed above, no later than the date of each product’s release in the United States.

28
APPLE’S SECOND AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S INTERROGATORY NO. 5

3

1

In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d), Apple refers to the following

2

documents because the burden of deriving or ascertaining the answer to this Interrogatory from

3

the produced business records is substantially the same for Apple as for Samsung: APLNDC-

4

Y0000056159, APLNDC-X0000007220, APLNDC00013715, and APLNDC00013690. Apple

5

also incorporates by reference its amended response to Interrogatory No. 6.

6

The foregoing response does not address recently-released Samsung products accused by

7

Apple in the action styled Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al., Case No. CV12-

8

00630-LHK (N.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2012). Apple, however, reserves the right to seek and enforce an

9

injunction against any Samsung products that are no more than colorably different from the

10

Samsung products found to infringe in this action and that infringe the Apple patents asserted in

11

this action or, in the alternative, are confusingly similar to the trade dress and trademark rights

12

asserted by Apple in this action.

13

Dated: March 8, 2012

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

14
15
16
17

By:

/s/ Richard S.J. Hung
RICHARD S.J. HUNG
Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
APPLE’S SECOND AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S INTERROGATORY NO. 5

4

1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
3

I declare that I am employed with the law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP, whose

4

address is Morrison & Foerster LLP, 425 Market St., San Francisco, California 94105-2482.

5

I am not a party to the within cause, and I am over the age of eighteen years.

6

I further declare that on Thursday, March 8, 2012, I served a copy of:

7
8

APPLE INC.’S SECOND AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSE TO
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.’S INTERROGATORY NO. 5 TO
APPLE INC.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE [Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)] by electronically mailing a
true and correct copy through Morrison & Foerster LLP’s electronic mail system to
the e-mail address(s) set forth below, or as stated on the attached service list per
agreement in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b).
Charles Kramer Verhoeven
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Edward J. DeFranco
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
335 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Kevin P.B. Johnson
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Michael Thomas Zeller
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
865 S. Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

28
APPLE’S SECOND AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S INTERROGATORY NO. 5

5

1
2
3
4

Victoria F. Maroulis
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Fifth Floor
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

5
6
7
8

Margret Mary Caruso
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

9
10
11
12
13

Todd Michael Briggs
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Fifth Floor
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Tel: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

16

Rachel H Kassabian
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
650-801-5000
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

17

Executed in San Francisco, California this 8th day of March, 2012.

14
15

18
/s/ Edith E. Perez________
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
APPLE’S SECOND AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S INTERROGATORY NO. 5

6