Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1044

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Reply In Support of Motion For Clarification of May 4, 2012 Order filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: #1 Samsung's Reply In Support of Motion For Clarification of May 4, 2012 Order, #2 Declaration of Dr. Jeffrey Johnson, #3 Exhibit 1 to Johnson Declaration, #4 Declaration of Mark Tung, #5 Exhibit 1, #6 Exhibit 2, #7 Exhibit 3)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 6/5/2012)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781) hmcelhinny@mofo.com MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368) jtaylor@mofo.com ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363) atucher@mofo.com RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) rhung@mofo.com JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530) jasonbartlett@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 10 11 12 WILLIAM F. LEE william.lee@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180) mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC. 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN JOSE DIVISION 17 18 19 APPLE INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, 20 21 22 23 24 25 v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK APPLE INC.’S SECOND AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSE TO SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.’S INTERROGATORY NO. 5 TO APPLE INC. Defendants. 26 27 28 APPLE’S SECOND AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSE TO SAMSUNG’S INTERROGATORY NO. 5 1 Under Rules 26 and 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 33, Apple 2 Inc. (“Apple”) hereby amends it objections and response to Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.’s 3 Interrogatory No. 5 served by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“Samsung”) on August 3, 2011. 4 5 GENERAL OBJECTIONS The General Objections set forth in Apple’s Objections and Responses to Samsung’s First 6 Set of Interrogatories, served on September 12, 2011, are incorporated herein by reference. 7 AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 5 8 Subject to the foregoing qualifications and General Objections and the specific objections 9 made below, Apple objects and responds to Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.’s Interrogatory No. 5 10 to Apple Inc. as follows: 11 INTERROGATORY NO. 5: 12 Separately for each of the APPLE PATENTS-IN-SUIT, APPLE TRADE DRESS and 13 APPLE TRADEMARKS, IDENTIFY every product manufactured, used, sold, offered for sale, or 14 imported into the United States since 2005 that YOU believe uses or may use any protected 15 design, trademark, trade dress, or invention of the APPLE PATENTS-IN-SUIT, APPLE TRADE 16 DRESS, and APPLE TRADEMARKS and the date(s) on which you believe that use occurred. 17 The products shall be identified by product name, product manufacturer, telecommunications 18 carrier (if applicable), date of product announcement, date of product release, and appearance of 19 product – including front, back, and side images. 20 SECOND AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 5: 21 Apple objects to the phrase “appearance of product” as vague and ambiguous. Apple 22 objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad, unduly burdensome, and not reasonably calculated to 23 lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, especially to the extent it requests: (i) “every 24 product,” including products not at issue in this litigation; (ii) the production of objects or images 25 in response to an Interrogatory; (iii) information concerning the “appearance of product – 26 including front, back, and side images”; and (iv) Samsung products released outside of the United 27 States. Apple further objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information that: (i) 28 requires the disclosure of information, documents, and things protected from disclosure by the APPLE’S SECOND AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S INTERROGATORY NO. 5 1 1 attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, common interest doctrine, joint defense 2 privilege, or any other applicable privilege, doctrine, or immunity; (ii) would require Apple to 3 draw a legal conclusion to respond; (iii) is outside of Apple’s possession, custody, or control; (iv) 4 can be obtained as easily by Samsung, is already in Samsung’s possession, or is publicly 5 available; (v) concerns use of any asserted trademark or trade dress before 2007; (vi) would 6 require Apple to draw a legal conclusion to respond; or (vii) is subject to a confidentiality or 7 nondisclosure agreement or governed by a protective order preventing its production. 8 9 10 11 Subject to and incorporating its General Objections and its specific objections, Apple responds as follows with respect to the Samsung products accused in Apple’s Amended Complaint: At least the following Samsung devices use or may use inventions claimed by the ‘002, 12 ‘891, ‘163, ‘915, and ‘828 patents: Acclaim, Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, 13 Exhibit 4G, Fascinate, Galaxy Ace, Galaxy Prevail, Galaxy S (i9000), Galaxy S 4G, Galaxy S 2 14 (AT&T; i9100; T-Mobile; Epic 4G Touch; Skyrocket), Galaxy S Showcase (i500), Galaxy Tab 15 7.0, Galaxy Tab 10.1, Gem, Gravity Smart, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Intercept, Mesmerize, Nexus S, 16 Nexus S 4G, Replenish, Sidekick, Transform, and Vibrant. 17 At least the following Samsung devices use or may use inventions claimed by the ‘381 18 patent: Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Exhibit 4G, Fascinate, Galaxy Ace, 19 Galaxy Prevail, Galaxy S (i9000), Galaxy S 4G, Galaxy S 2 (Epic 4G Touch), Gravity Smart, 20 Indulge, Infuse 4G, Intercept, Mesmerize, Nexus S, Nexus S 4G, Replenish, Sidekick, Vibrant, 21 Galaxy Tab 7.0, and Galaxy Tab 10.1. 22 23 24 25 At least the following Samsung devices use or may use inventions claimed by the ‘607 and ‘129 patents: Galaxy Tab 7.0 and Galaxy Tab 10.1. At least the following Samsung devices use or may use the invention claimed by the D’889 patent: Galaxy Tab 10.1. 26 At least the following Samsung devices use or may use the inventions claimed by the 27 D’087, D’677, and D’270 patents: Fascinate, Galaxy Ace, Galaxy S i9000, Galaxy S2 i9100, 28 APPLE’S SECOND AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S INTERROGATORY NO. 5 2 1 Galaxy S 4G, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, Galaxy S Showcase (i500), Vibrant, Galaxy S2 Epic 4G 2 Touch, Galaxy S2 (T-Mobile), Galaxy S2 (AT&T), and Galaxy S2 Skyrocket. 3 At least the following Samsung devices use or may use the inventions claimed by the 4 D’790, D’305, and D’334 patents: Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Fascinate, 5 Gem, Galaxy S i9000, Galaxy S 4G, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, Galaxy S Showcase (i500), 6 and Vibrant. 7 At least the Samsung Vibrant, Mesmerize, Infuse 4G, Galaxy S 4G, Fascinate, Galaxy S2 8 i9100, Galaxy S2 Epic 4G Touch, Galaxy S2 (AT&T), Galaxy S2 (T-Mobile), Galaxy S2 9 Skyrocket, Captivate, Galaxy Ace, Galaxy S i9000, Droid Charge, Continuum, Epic 4G, Galaxy 10 Prevail, and Galaxy S Showcase (i500) products use or may use a combination of elements from 11 Apple’s Original iPhone Trade Dress, iPhone 3G Trade Dress, iPhone 4 Trade Dress, iPhone 12 Trade Dress; the trade dress shown in the Trade Dress Registrations; and the trade dress shown in 13 U.S. Application Serial No. 85/299,118. Apple alleges that at least the Samsung Vibrant, 14 Acclaim, Galaxy S Showcase (i500), Mesmerize, Infuse 4G, Indulge, Intercept, Galaxy S i9000, 15 Galaxy S 4G, Galaxy Ace, Galaxy Prevail, Fascinate, Gem, Gravity Smart, Epic 4G, Exhibit 4G, 16 Droid Charge, Continuum, Captivate, Galaxy S2 i9100, Galaxy S2 Epic 4G Touch, Galaxy S2 17 (AT&T), Galaxy S2 (T-Mobile), Galaxy S2 Skyrocket, Galaxy S i9000, Galaxy Tab 7.0, Galaxy 18 Tab 7.0 Plus, Galaxy Tab 10.1 products use or may use icons that infringe the Registered Icon 19 Trademarks, the Purple iTunes Store Trademark, and the iTunes Eighth Note and CD Design 20 Trademark. Apple alleges that at least the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Galaxy Tab 7.0, and Galaxy Tab 7.0 21 Plus use or may use a combination of elements from the iPad Trade Dress and the iPad 2 Trade 22 Dress; and the trade dress shown in U.S. Application Serial Nos. 77/921,838, 77/921,829, and 23 77/921,869. Apple alleges that at least the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Galaxy Tab 7.0, and Galaxy Tab 7.0 24 Plus use or may use icons that infringe the Registered Icon Trademarks, the Purple iTunes Store 25 Trademark, and the iTunes Eighth Note and CD Design Trademark. Apple believes that the use 26 or possible use of its patented inventions, trade dress, and trademarks occurred, for each product 27 listed above, no later than the date of each product’s release in the United States. 28 APPLE’S SECOND AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S INTERROGATORY NO. 5 3 1 In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d), Apple refers to the following 2 documents because the burden of deriving or ascertaining the answer to this Interrogatory from 3 the produced business records is substantially the same for Apple as for Samsung: APLNDC- 4 Y0000056159, APLNDC-X0000007220, APLNDC00013715, and APLNDC00013690. Apple 5 also incorporates by reference its amended response to Interrogatory No. 6. 6 The foregoing response does not address recently-released Samsung products accused by 7 Apple in the action styled Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al., Case No. CV12- 8 00630-LHK (N.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2012). Apple, however, reserves the right to seek and enforce an 9 injunction against any Samsung products that are no more than colorably different from the 10 Samsung products found to infringe in this action and that infringe the Apple patents asserted in 11 this action or, in the alternative, are confusingly similar to the trade dress and trademark rights 12 asserted by Apple in this action. 13 Dated: March 8, 2012 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 14 15 16 17 By: /s/ Richard S.J. Hung RICHARD S.J. HUNG Attorneys for Plaintiff APPLE INC. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 APPLE’S SECOND AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S INTERROGATORY NO. 5 4 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 3 I declare that I am employed with the law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP, whose 4 address is Morrison & Foerster LLP, 425 Market St., San Francisco, California 94105-2482. 5 I am not a party to the within cause, and I am over the age of eighteen years. 6 I further declare that on Thursday, March 8, 2012, I served a copy of: 7 8 APPLE INC.’S SECOND AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSE TO SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.’S INTERROGATORY NO. 5 TO APPLE INC. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE [Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)] by electronically mailing a true and correct copy through Morrison & Foerster LLP’s electronic mail system to the e-mail address(s) set forth below, or as stated on the attached service list per agreement in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b). Charles Kramer Verhoeven Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: 415-875-6600 Email: charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com Edward J. DeFranco Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 335 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, NY 10017 Tel: 212-849-7000 Fax: 212-849-7100 Email: eddefranco@quinnemanuel.com Kevin P.B. Johnson Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Tel: 650-801-5000 Fax: 650-801-5100 Email: kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com Michael Thomas Zeller Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 865 S. Figueroa Street, 10th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Tel: 213-443-3000 Fax: 213-443-3100 Email: michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com 28 APPLE’S SECOND AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S INTERROGATORY NO. 5 5 1 2 3 4 Victoria F. Maroulis Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Fifth Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Tel: 650-801-5000 Fax: 650-801-5100 Email: victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com 5 6 7 8 Margret Mary Caruso Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Tel: 650-801-5000 Fax: 650-801-5100 Email: margretcaruso@quinnemanuel.com 9 10 11 12 13 Todd Michael Briggs Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Fifth Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Tel: 650-801-5000 Email: toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com 16 Rachel H Kassabian Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 650-801-5000 Fax: 650-801-5100 Email: rachelkassabian@quinnemanuel.com 17 Executed in San Francisco, California this 8th day of March, 2012. 14 15 18 /s/ Edith E. Perez________ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 APPLE’S SECOND AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S INTERROGATORY NO. 5 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?