Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1047

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Apple's Reply in Support of Motion for Adverse Inference Jury Instructions Due to Samsung's Spoliation of Evidence (Dkt. 895) filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Apple's Reply Brief, #3 Declaration of Esther Kim)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 6/5/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
[e-mail]
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
[e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

WILLIAM F. LEE
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10
11

Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.

12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN JOSE DIVISION
15
16

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,

17
18
19
20
21
22

v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.

23
24
25
26
27
28
APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

1

In accordance with Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, and General Order No. 62, Apple Inc.

2

(“Apple”) submits this motion for an order to seal the following documents or portions thereof:

3

1. The confidential, unredacted version of Apple Inc.’s Reply in Support of Motion For

4

Adverse Inference Jury Instructions Due To Samsung’s Spoliation of Evidence (“Reply”);

5

2. The confidential, unredacted version of the Reply Declaration Of Esther Kim In Support

6

Of Apple Inc.’s Motion For Adverse Inference Jury Instructions Due To Samsung’s

7

Spoliation Of Evidence (“Kim Declaration”); and

8

3. Exhibits 1-11 to the Kim Declaration in their entirety.

9

The Reply contains confidential information that this Court has previously ordered sealed.

10

(See Dkt. No. 126 (sealing the declaration of Richard J. Lutton, Jr.).) It and the other documents

11

listed above also discuss information that Samsung has designated as confidential under the

12

protective order entered in this case. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 79-5(d), Samsung has filed the

13

Declaration of Daniel Shim in Support of Samsung’s Administrative Motion to File Documents

14

Under Seal (see Dkt. No. 987-2, the “Shim Declaration”) for the purpose of establishing that the

15

designated information is sealable. Should any additional declaration be required to seal the

16

information above, Apple expects that, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d), Samsung will seek

17

to establish good cause to permit the sealing of these materials.

18

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-(c), Apple will lodge the Reply and Kim Declaration with

19

the Clerk with the sealable portions highlighted. Redacted versions of the Reply and the Kim

20

Declaration are attached as exhibits hereto.

21

Dated: June 5, 2012

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

22
23

By:

24

/s/ Michael A. Jacobs
Michael A. Jacobs
Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.

25
26
27
28
APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK

1