Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1059

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Apply's Reply to Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion to Exclude Opinions of Certain of Samsung's Experts filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Public Reply, #2 Reply Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 6/7/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
[e-mail]
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
[e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10
11
12

WILLIAM F. LEE
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN JOSE DIVISION

16
17

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,

18
19
20
21
22

v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,

23

Defendants.

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
REPLY DECLARATION OF
JASON R. BARTLETT IN
SUPPORT OF APPLE’S REPLY TO
SAMSUNG’S OPPOSITION TO
APPLE’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE
OPINIONS OF CERTAIN OF
SAMSUNG’S EXPERTS
Date:
Time:
Place:
Judge:

June 21, 2012
1:30 p.m.
Courtroom 8, 4th Floor
Hon. Lucy H. Koh

24
25
26
27
28

REPLY BARTLETT DECL. ISO APPLE’S REPLY TO SAMSUNG’S OPP. TO APPLE’S MOT. TO EXCLUDE OPINIONS
OF CERTAIN OF SAMSUNG’S EXPERTS
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)

sf-3154683

1

I, Jason R. Bartlett, do hereby declare as follows:

2

1.

I am a partner in the law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP, counsel for Apple Inc.

3

(“Apple”) in this action. I am licensed to practice law in the State of California and admitted to

4

practice before this Court. I submit this Reply Declaration in support of Apple’s Reply to

5

Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion to Exclude Opinions of Certain of Samsung’s Experts

6

(“Reply”). Unless otherwise indicated, I have personal knowledge of the matters stated herein or

7

understand them to be true from members of my litigation team. If called as a witness, I would

8

testify to the facts set forth below.

9

2.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of images from the Expert

10

Report of Sam Lucente at pages 37-39, which Mr. Lucente characterizes as depicting the LG

11

Prada phone, a color version of Figure 1 of the D’305 patent, and Figure 1 of the D’334 patent.

12
13

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this
Declaration was executed this 7th day of June 2012, at San Francisco, California.

14
15

/s/ Jason R. Bartlett
JASON R. BARTLETT

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

REPLY BARTLETT DECL. ISO APPLE’S REPLY TO SAMSUNG’S OPP. TO APPLE’S MOT. TO EXCLUDE OPINIONS OF
CERTAIN OF SAMSUNG’S EXPERTS
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3154683

1

1
2

ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE
I, Michael A. Jacobs, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this

3

Reply Declaration. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Jason R.

4

Bartlett has concurred in this filing.

5

Dated: June 7, 2012

6

/s/ Michael A. Jacobs
Michael A. Jacobs

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

REPLY BARTLETT DECL. ISO APPLE’S REPLY TO SAMSUNG’S OPP. TO APPLE’S MOT. TO EXCLUDE OPINIONS OF
CERTAIN OF SAMSUNG’S EXPERTS
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3154683

2