Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1087

REPLY (re #965 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Motion to Enforce April 12, 2012 Order ) Samsung's Reply Brief In Support Of Motion To Enforce April 12 Order filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Diane C. Hutnyan In Support of Motion to Enforce April 12 Order, #2 Exhibit A to Reply Declaration of Diane C. Hutnyan In Support of Motion to Enforce April 12 Order, #3 Exhibit B to Reply Declaration of Diane C. Hutnyan In Support of Motion to Enforce April 12 Order, #4 Exhibit C to Reply Declaration of Diane C. Hutnyan In Support of Motion to Enforce April 12 Order, #5 Exhibit D to Reply Declaration of Diane C. Hutnyan In Support of Motion to Enforce April 12 Order, #6 Exhibit E to Reply Declaration of Diane C. Hutnyan In Support of Motion to Enforce April 12 Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 6/12/2012)

EXHIBIT A

425 MARKET STREET
SAN FRANCISCO
CALIFORNIA 94105-2482
U.S.A.

MO RRI SO N & F O E RST E R L LP

TELEPHONE: [phone]
FACSIMILE: 415.268.7522

T O K YO , L O N D O N , BR U SSE L S,
BE I JI N G , SH AN G H AI , H O N G K O N G

N E W YO RK , SAN F RAN C I SCO ,
L O S A N G E L E S, P A L O A L T O ,
SAC RAME N T O , SAN D I E G O ,
D E N VE R, N O RT H E RN VI RG I N I A,
WASH I N G T O N , D .C.

WWW.MOFO.COM

April 15, 2012

Writer’s Direct Contact
415.268.6024
[e-mail]

By Email ([e-mail])
Diane Hutnyan
Quinn Emanuel
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Re:

Apple v. Samsung, Case No. 11-cv-1846-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal.)

Dear Diane:
This letter responds to your email sent the afternoon of Friday, April 13, 2012.
In light of Judge Grewal’s April 12, 2012, Order, Apple agrees that all transcripts of
depositions taken in Certain Electronic Digital Media Devices and Components Thereof,
ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-796 (“ITC 796”) are deemed produced in Apple v. Samsung, Case No.
11-cv-1846-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal.) (the “N.D. Cal. case”).
Apple reserves its right to challenge admissibility of ITC 796 transcripts in the N.D. Cal.
case.
Sincerely,
/s/ Mia Mazza
Mia Mazza
cc:

S. Calvin Walden
Peter Kolovos

sf-3133316