Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1088

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Reply in Support of Motion for Rule 37 Sanctions, #3 Reply Declaration of Diane C. Hutnyan, #4 Exhibit 1, #5 Exhibit 2, #6 Exhibit 3, #7 Exhibit 4, #8 Exhibit 5, #9 Exhibit 6, #10 Exhibit 7, #11 Exhibit 8, #12 Exhibit 9, #13 Exhibit 10, #14 Exhibit 11, #15 Exhibit 12, #16 Exhibit 13)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 6/12/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10
11
12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,

13

vs.

14

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
16 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
18

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS
UNDER SEAL

Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4808200.1

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) have filed Samsung’s Reply in
Support of Motion for Rule 37 Sanctions for Apple’s Violation of December 22, 2011 Court
Order.
Apple Inc. (“Apple”) has filed the declaration required under Civil L.R. 79-5 and General
Order No. 62 to provide evidence of good cause for this Court to permit filing under seal. The
declaration establishes that the below documents contain information that has been designated by
Apple as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS that the following documents

2 shall be filed under seal:
3

1. The confidential, unredacted version of Samsung's Reply in Support of Motion for

4

Rule 37 Sanctions for Apple’s Violation of December 22, 2011 Court Order

5

(“Motion”); and

6
7

2. Exhibits 7-13 to the Reply Declaration of Diane C. Hutnyan in Support of the
Motion.

8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11 DATED: ______________, 2012
12
13
14

Honorable Paul S. Grewal
United States Magistrate Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

02198.51855/4808200.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL