Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1122
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Regarding Apples Administrative Motion For Leave To File Objection To Reply Evidence filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 6/22/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
hmcelhinny@mofo.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
mjacobs@mofo.com
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
jtaylor@mofo.com
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
atucher@mofo.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
rhung@mofo.com
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
jasonbartlett@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: (415) 268-7000
Facsimile: (415) 268-7522
WILLIAM F. LEE
william.lee@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: (617) 526-6000
Facsimile: (617) 526-5000
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 858-6000
Facsimile: (650) 858-6100
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN JOSE DIVISION
16
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
17
18
19
20
21
22
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS
REGARDING APPLE’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE OBJECTION TO
REPLY EVIDENCE
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS RE APPLE’S MOT. FOR LEAVE TO FILE OBJECTION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3162717
1
2
In accordance with Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, and General Order No. 62, Apple Inc.
(“Apple”) submits this motion for an order to seal the following documents or portions thereof:
3
1.
The confidential, unredacted Supplemental Declaration of Ravin Balakrishnan,
4
Ph.D. in Support of Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Summary
5
Judgment (“Supplemental Balakrishnan Declaration”) (Exhibit B to Apple’s
6
Administrative Motion for Leave to File Objection to Reply Evidence), which has
7
been designated confidential as set forth below.
8
9
The Supplemental Balakrishnan Declaration contains information that Samsung has
represented was designated “under the protective order” by third party MERL, and which
10
Samsung designated “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” until it could confer with
11
third Party MERL about the appropriate designation. Apple expects that, pursuant to Civil Local
12
Rule 79-5(d), either Samsung or third party MERL will file a declaration seeking to establish
13
good cause to permit the sealing of these materials. A copy of this motion will concurrently be
14
sent to third party MERL.
15
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(c), Apple will lodge with the Clerk the documents at
16
issue.
17
Dated: June 22, 2012
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
18
19
20
21
By:
/s/ Michael A. Jacobs
MICHAEL A. JACOBS
Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS RE APPLE’S MOT. FOR LEAVE TO FILE OBJECTION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3162717
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?