Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1127

RESPONSE (re #1121 MOTION for Leave to File Apples Administrative Motion For Leave To File Objection To Reply Evidence ) Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Objection to Reply Evidence filed bySamsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 6/23/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
APPLE INC., a California corporation,

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG

12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
16 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
18

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE OBJECTION TO
REPLY EVIDENCE

Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
02198.51855/4800812.1

28

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE OBJECTION TO REPLY EVIDENCE

-1-

1

Having considered Apple’s Administrative Motion for Leave to File Objection to Reply

2 Evidence, and Samsung’s Opposition thereto, the Court DENIES Apple’s motion.
3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6 DATED:

______________, 2012

7
8
9

Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
02198.51855/4800812.1

28

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE OBJECTION TO REPLY EVIDENCE

-2-