Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1128
RESPONSE (re #1119 MOTION for Leave to File Apple Inc.s Motion For Leave To File Supplemental Response Re Arguments Made At June 21 Hearing ) filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 6/23/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN JOSE DIVISION
12 APPLE INC., a California corporation,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG
13
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
APPLE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE RE
ARGUMENTS MADE AT JUNE 21
HEARING
14
Plaintiff,
vs.
15 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
16 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
17 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4825903.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE
1
Having considered Apple's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Response Re
2 Arguments Made at June 21 Hearing and Samsung's Response thereto, Apple's Motion is
3 DENIED.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7 DATED: ______________, 2012
8
9
10
11
Honorable Paul S. Grewal
United States Magistrate Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4825903.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?