Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1128

RESPONSE (re #1119 MOTION for Leave to File Apple Inc.s Motion For Leave To File Supplemental Response Re Arguments Made At June 21 Hearing ) filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 6/23/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG 13 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE RE ARGUMENTS MADE AT JUNE 21 HEARING 14 Plaintiff, vs. 15 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG 16 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG 17 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/4825903.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE 1 Having considered Apple's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Response Re 2 Arguments Made at June 21 Hearing and Samsung's Response thereto, Apple's Motion is 3 DENIED. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 DATED: ______________, 2012 8 9 10 11 Honorable Paul S. Grewal United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/4825903.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG -1[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?