Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1177

REPLY (re #1089 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal ) Apples Reply Regarding Design Patent Claim Construction filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Of Jason R. Bartlett In Support Of Apples Reply Regarding Design Patent Claim Construction, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 7/3/2012)

Download PDF
Exhibit 2 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 3 San Jose Division 4 Case No. 11-CV-846 LHK 5 _______________________________________ 6 APPLE, INCORPORATED, 7 8 9 10 Plaintiff, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANIES, ) et al, ) Defendants. 15 H I G H L Y C O N F I D E N T I A L * ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY * 16 17 ) _______________________________________ ) 13 14 ) ) 11 12 ) DEPOSITION OF PETER BRESSLER 18 19 Washington, D.C. 20 April 24, 2012 21 22 23 24 Reported by: 25 Job No. 48797 Mary Ann Payonk, RDR-CRR TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 5 1 PETER BRESSLER, 09:13 2 called as a witness, having been duly 09:13 3 sworn, was examined and testified as 09:13 4 follows: 09:13 5 6 EXAMINATION 09:13 BY MR. ZELLER: 09:13 7 Q. Good morning. 09:13 8 A. Good morning. 09:13 MR. ZELLER: 09:13 9 Let's please mark as 10 Exhibit 3510 a copy of United States 09:13 11 design patent 504889. 09:13 12 (P. Bressler Exhibit No. 3510 was marked 09:14 13 for identification.) 09:14 MR. ZELLER: 09:14 14 Please mark as 15 Exhibit 3511 a copy of United States 09:14 16 design patent 593087. 09:14 17 (P. Bressler Exhibit No. 3511 was marked 09:14 18 for identification.) 09:14 MR. ZELLER: 09:14 19 Please mark as 20 Exhibit 3512 a copy of United States 09:14 21 design patent 618677. 09:14 22 (P. Bressler Exhibit No. 3512 was marked 09:14 23 for identification.) 09:14 MR. ZELLER: 09:14 24 25 Please mark as Exhibit 3513 a copy of United States TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 09:14 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 50 1 Do you see that? 10:40 2 A. I do. 10:40 3 Q. As we talked about, when you compare 10:40 4 figure 1 and figure 3, there are diagonal lines 10:40 5 on both of those figures. 10:40 6 A. Correct. 10:40 7 Q. And you understand that figure 1 and 10:40 8 figure 3 are different perspectives of the top 10:40 9 view of the electronic device, design? 10:40 10 A. Top view? 10:40 11 Q. Right. 10:40 12 A. Is that how it's stated? 10:40 13 Q. If you look at the description, 10:40 14 you'll see. 10:40 15 A. Okay. 10:41 16 Q. Then you understand that figures 2 10:41 17 and 4 are views of the bottom -- 10:41 18 A. Yes. 10:41 19 Q. -- of the electronic device design. 10:41 20 So you'll see figures 1 and 3 and figures 2 and 10:41 21 4 correspond to one another. 10:41 22 A. Correct. 10:41 23 Q. Do you have any understanding or 10:41 24 explanation as to why there are diagonal lines 10:41 25 on figure 2, but not on figure 4, and why the 10:41 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 51 1 fact that those diagonal lines are also, in 10:41 2 fact, on both figures 1 and figure 3? 10:41 3 MR. BARQUIST: Objection, vague and 10:41 4 ambiguous, misstates the document. 10:41 5 A. 10:41 I believe that the diagonal lines 6 included in figure 2 are used to help identify 10:41 7 the topography of figure 4 to illustrate that 10:41 8 it is flat. 10:41 Q. 10:42 9 Is the bottom of the design shown in 10 the '889 design patent reflective, translucent, 10:42 11 or transparent? 10:42 12 A. I don't believe so. 10:42 13 Q. Directing your attention to figure 9, 10:42 14 you'll see that there's a human figure in 10:42 15 dotted line, at least in part. 10:42 16 hand is still not excluded. You'll see his 10:43 17 A. Yes. 10:43 18 Q. But setting that aside for a moment, 10:43 19 you generally understanding that the depiction 10:43 20 of the human figure here is to show orientation 10:43 21 and environment for the device? 10:43 22 23 24 25 A. That's what it explains in the description, yes. Q. 10:43 Do you have an understanding as to whether or not this tablet computer design that TSG Reporting - Worldwide 10:43 877-702-9580 10:43 10:43 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 281 1 2 C E R T I F I C A T E DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: 3 4 I, MARY ANN PAYONK, CRR-RDR, CBC, CCP, 5 CLR, shorthand reporter, do hereby certify: 6 That the witness whose deposition is 7 hereinbefore set forth was duly sworn, and that 8 such deposition is a true record of the 9 testimony given by such witness. 10 I further certify that I am not related 11 to any of the parties to this action by blood 12 or marriage, and that I am in no way interested 13 in the outcome of this matter. 14 15 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 24th day of April, 2012. 16 17 _______________________________________ 18 MARY ANN PAYONK, CRR-RDR, CBC, CCP, CLR 19 Shorthand Reporter 20 21 22 23 24 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?