Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1177
REPLY (re #1089 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal ) Apples Reply Regarding Design Patent Claim Construction filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Of Jason R. Bartlett In Support Of Apples Reply Regarding Design Patent Claim Construction, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 7/3/2012)
Exhibit 2
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
Page 1
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
3
San Jose Division
4
Case No. 11-CV-846 LHK
5
_______________________________________
6
APPLE, INCORPORATED,
7
8
9
10
Plaintiff,
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANIES,
)
et al,
)
Defendants.
15
H I G H L Y
C O N F I D E N T I A L
* ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY *
16
17
)
_______________________________________ )
13
14
)
)
11
12
)
DEPOSITION OF PETER BRESSLER
18
19
Washington, D.C.
20
April 24, 2012
21
22
23
24
Reported by:
25
Job No. 48797
Mary Ann Payonk, RDR-CRR
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
877-702-9580
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
Page 5
1
PETER BRESSLER,
09:13
2
called as a witness, having been duly
09:13
3
sworn, was examined and testified as
09:13
4
follows:
09:13
5
6
EXAMINATION
09:13
BY MR. ZELLER:
09:13
7
Q.
Good morning.
09:13
8
A.
Good morning.
09:13
MR. ZELLER:
09:13
9
Let's please mark as
10
Exhibit 3510 a copy of United States
09:13
11
design patent 504889.
09:13
12
(P. Bressler Exhibit No. 3510 was marked
09:14
13
for identification.)
09:14
MR. ZELLER:
09:14
14
Please mark as
15
Exhibit 3511 a copy of United States
09:14
16
design patent 593087.
09:14
17
(P. Bressler Exhibit No. 3511 was marked
09:14
18
for identification.)
09:14
MR. ZELLER:
09:14
19
Please mark as
20
Exhibit 3512 a copy of United States
09:14
21
design patent 618677.
09:14
22
(P. Bressler Exhibit No. 3512 was marked
09:14
23
for identification.)
09:14
MR. ZELLER:
09:14
24
25
Please mark as
Exhibit 3513 a copy of United States
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
877-702-9580
09:14
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
Page 50
1
Do you see that?
10:40
2
A.
I do.
10:40
3
Q.
As we talked about, when you compare
10:40
4
figure 1 and figure 3, there are diagonal lines
10:40
5
on both of those figures.
10:40
6
A.
Correct.
10:40
7
Q.
And you understand that figure 1 and
10:40
8
figure 3 are different perspectives of the top
10:40
9
view of the electronic device, design?
10:40
10
A.
Top view?
10:40
11
Q.
Right.
10:40
12
A.
Is that how it's stated?
10:40
13
Q.
If you look at the description,
10:40
14
you'll see.
10:40
15
A.
Okay.
10:41
16
Q.
Then you understand that figures 2
10:41
17
and 4 are views of the bottom --
10:41
18
A.
Yes.
10:41
19
Q.
-- of the electronic device design.
10:41
20
So you'll see figures 1 and 3 and figures 2 and
10:41
21
4 correspond to one another.
10:41
22
A.
Correct.
10:41
23
Q.
Do you have any understanding or
10:41
24
explanation as to why there are diagonal lines
10:41
25
on figure 2, but not on figure 4, and why the
10:41
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
877-702-9580
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
Page 51
1
fact that those diagonal lines are also, in
10:41
2
fact, on both figures 1 and figure 3?
10:41
3
MR. BARQUIST:
Objection, vague and
10:41
4
ambiguous, misstates the document.
10:41
5
A.
10:41
I believe that the diagonal lines
6
included in figure 2 are used to help identify
10:41
7
the topography of figure 4 to illustrate that
10:41
8
it is flat.
10:41
Q.
10:42
9
Is the bottom of the design shown in
10
the '889 design patent reflective, translucent,
10:42
11
or transparent?
10:42
12
A.
I don't believe so.
10:42
13
Q.
Directing your attention to figure 9,
10:42
14
you'll see that there's a human figure in
10:42
15
dotted line, at least in part.
10:42
16
hand is still not excluded.
You'll see his
10:43
17
A.
Yes.
10:43
18
Q.
But setting that aside for a moment,
10:43
19
you generally understanding that the depiction
10:43
20
of the human figure here is to show orientation
10:43
21
and environment for the device?
10:43
22
23
24
25
A.
That's what it explains in the
description, yes.
Q.
10:43
Do you have an understanding as to
whether or not this tablet computer design that
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
10:43
877-702-9580
10:43
10:43
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
Page 281
1
2
C E R T I F I C A T E
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA:
3
4
I, MARY ANN PAYONK, CRR-RDR, CBC, CCP,
5
CLR, shorthand reporter, do hereby certify:
6
That the witness whose deposition is
7
hereinbefore set forth was duly sworn, and that
8
such deposition is a true record of the
9
testimony given by such witness.
10
I further certify that I am not related
11
to any of the parties to this action by blood
12
or marriage, and that I am in no way interested
13
in the outcome of this matter.
14
15
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set
my hand this 24th day of April, 2012.
16
17
_______________________________________
18
MARY ANN PAYONK, CRR-RDR, CBC, CCP, CLR
19
Shorthand Reporter
20
21
22
23
24
25
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
877-702-9580
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?