Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1184

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Re Apples Motions In Limine filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Of Cyndi Wheeler In Support Of Apples Administrative Motions To File Documents Under Seal Re Apples Motions In Limine, #2 [Proposed] Order Granting Apple Inc.s Administrative Motion To File Documents Under Seal Re Apples Motions In Limine, #3 Apples Motions In Limine, #4 Declaration Of Jason Bartlett In Support Of Apples Motions In Limine, #5 Exhibit 1, #6 Exhibit 3, #7 Exhibit 4, #8 Exhibit 5, #9 Exhibit 6, #10 Exhibit 7, #11 Exhibit 8, #12 Exhibit 9, #13 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 7/5/2012)

Exhibit 9

Page 2131
BEFORE THE
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

___________________________
In the Matter of:

)

CERTAIN ELECTRONIC DIGITAL )
MEDIA DEVICES AND

337-TA-796

)

COMPONENTS THEREOF

Investigation No.

)

___________________________
Main Hearing Room

United States
International Trade Commission
500 E Street, Southwest
Washington, D.C.

Thursday, June 7, 2012

Volume 6

The parties met, pursuant to the notice of the
Judge, at 8:45 a.m.

BEFORE:

THE HONORABLE THOMAS B. PENDER

Page 2132
1

APPEARANCES:

2
3

For Complainant Apple, Inc.:

4

HAROLD J. McELHINNY, ESQ.

5

MICHAEL A. JACOBS, ESQ.

6

RACHEL KREVANS, ESQ.

7

MATTHEW KREEGER, ESQ.

8

Morrison & Foerster LLP

9

425 Market Street

10

San Francisco, CA 94105

11
12

ALEXANDER J. HADJIS, ESQ.

13

KRISTIN L. YOHANNAN, ESQ.

14

Morrison & Foerster LLP

15

2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

16

Washington, D.C. 20006

17
18

CHARLES S. BARQUIST, ESQ.

19

Morrison & Foerster LLP.

20

555 West Fifth Street

21

Los Angeles, CA 90013

22
23
24
25

Page 2133
1

APPEARANCES (Continued):

2
3

For Respondents Samsung Electronics Co.,

4

Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and

5

Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC:

6

CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN, ESQ.

7

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP

8

50 California Street, 22nd Floor

9

San Francisco, CA 94111

10
11

KEVIN P.B. JOHNSON, ESQ.

12

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP

13

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor

14

Redwood Shores, CA 94065

15
16

RYAN S. GOLDSTEIN, ESQ.

17

MICHAEL T. ZELLER, ESQ.

18

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP

19

865 South Figueroa St., 10th Floor.

20

Los Angeles, CA 90017

21
22

ERIC HUANG, ESQ.

23

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP

24

51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor

25

New York, New York 10010

Page 2134
1

APPEARANCES (Continued):

2
3

For Respondents Samsung Electronics Co.,

4

Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and

5

Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC:

6

JOSEPH MILOWIC, III, ESQ.

7

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP

8

51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor

9

New York, New York 10010

10
11

S. ALEX LASHER, ESQ.

12

PAUL BRINKMAN, ESQ.

13

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP

14

1101 Pennsylvania Avenue

15

Washington, D.C. 20004

16
17

MARC K. WEINSTEIN, ESQ.

18

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP

19

NBF Higiya Building, 25F, 1-1-7

20

Uchisaiwai-cho, Chiyoda-ku,

21

Tokyo, 100-0011, Japan

22
23
24
25

Page 2135
1

APPEARANCES (Continued):

2
3
4
5
6
7

For ITC Staff:
REGINALD LUCAS, ESQ.
Investigative Attorney
DAVID LLOYD, ESQ.
Supervisory Attorney

8

U.S. International Trade Commission

9

500 E Street, S.W.

10

Washington, D.C. 20436

11
12

Attorney-Advisor:

13

GREGORY MOLDAFSKY, ESQ.

14

Attorney-Advisor

15

Office of Administrative Law Judges

16

U.S. International Trade Commission

17

500 E Street, S.W.

18

Washington, D.C. 20436

19
20
21

Also Present:

Albert Kim, Interpreter
Ann Park, Check Interpreter

22
23
24
25

*** Index appears at end of transcript ***

Page 2372
1

JUDGE PENDER:

And the thing you

2

should be showing the witness is the backside

3

and front.

4

I would not let you have gotten away with that

5

inside the hearing room, had he objected or

6

Mr. Barquist had objected, if they hadn't, then

7

it was up to them.

And Mr. McElhinny's exactly right.

8

But here they are, they're objecting

9

now, and I'm going to sustain, if there's any

10

testimony based on that kind of situation, I'll

11

sustain an objection.

Is that clear?

12

MR. McELHINNY:

13

JUDGE PENDER:

14

inherently misleading.

15

The last -Because I think it's

MR. McELHINNY:

I believe, literally,

16

the last issue, Your Honor, is what we call the

17

nonprior art, and this is the mirror image of

18

the judicial notice.

19

patents which, as I pointed out to you, were

20

never -- post-dated patents that were never

21

shown to any witnesses.

22

So we had a group of

There were also a group of post-dated

23

patents that were shown to witnesses at

24

depositions.

25

JUDGE PENDER:

Now, we're talking

Page 2500
1

(The following list of exhibits was

2

given to the court reporter and received in

3

evidence for the Robert Anders Rebuttal:

4

CX-2430C, RX-3631, RDX-32, RDX-33, RDX-37,

5

RX-0365, RX-0371, RX-0485, RX-0487, RX-0516,

6

RX-0591, RX-0595, RX-0621, RX-0691, RX-0729,

7

RX-1031, RX-1961, RX-2460, RX-2539C, RX-2739,

8

RX-2750, RPX-81, RPX-89, RPX-92, RPX-106,

9

RPX-118, RPX-124, RPX-144, RPX-149, RPX-156,

10

RPX-161, RPX-164, RPX-165, RPX-168, JX-0001,

11

JX-0002, JX-0082, JX-0083, JX-0084, and

12

JX-0100.)

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

(Whereupon, at 4:50 p.m., the hearing
was adjourned.)

Page 2577
1

CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER

2

TITLE:

3

INVESTIGATION NO:

4

HEARING DATE:

5

LOCATION:

6

NATURE OF HEARING:

7

I hereby certify that the foregoing/attached
transcript is a true, correct and complete record of
the above-referenced proceedings of the U.S.
International Trade Commission.
Date: June 7, 2012

8
9
10
11
12

Certain Electronic Digital Media Devices
337-TA-796

June 7, 2012

Washington, D.C.
Volume 6

SIGNED:CYNTHIA OTT______________________
Signature of the Contractor of the
Authorized Contractor's Representative
1220 L Street, N.W, Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20005

13

18

I hereby certify that I am not the Court
Reporter and that I have proofread the
above-referenced transcript of the proceedings of the
U.S. International Trade Commission, against the
aforementioned Court Reporter's notes and recordings,
for accuracy in transcription in the spelling,
hyphenation, punctuation and speaker identification
and did not make any changes of a substantive nature.
The foregoing/attached transcript is a true, correct
and complete transcription of the proceedings.

19

SIGNED:

14
15
16
17

H. NGUYEN ____________________________
Signature of Proofreader

20
21
22

I hereby certify that I reported the
above-referenced proceedings of the U.S. International
Trade Commission and caused to be prepared from my
tapes and notes of the proceedings a true, correct and
complete verbatim recording of the proceedings.

23
24
25

SIGNED:CYNTHIA OTT ___________________________
Signature of the Court Reporter