Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1206
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 [Public] Apple's Opposition to Samsung's Motions in Limine, #2 Declaration of Joseph Kanada, #3 Exhibit 8, #4 Exhibit 11, #5 Exhibit 13, #6 Exhibit 14, #7 Exhibit 15, #8 Errata 16, #9 Exhibit 17, #10 Exhibit 18, #11 Exhibit 19, #12 Exhibit 20, #13 Exhibit 21, #14 Exhibit 22, #15 Exhibit 23, #16 Exhibit 24, #17 Exhibit 25, #18 Exhibit 26, #19 Exhibit 27, #20 Exhibit 28, #21 Exhibit 29, #22 Exhibit 30, #23 Exhibit 31, #24 Exhibit 32, #25 Exhibit 33, #26 Exhibit 34, #27 Exhibit 35, #28 Exhibit 36, #29 Exhibit 37, #30 Exhibit 38, #31 Exhibit 39, #32 Exhibit 40)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 7/10/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
hmcelhinny@mofo.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
mjacobs@mofo.com
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
jtaylor@mofo.com
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
atucher@mofo.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
rhung@mofo.com
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
jasonbartlett@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: (415) 268-7000
Facsimile: (415) 268-7522
10
11
12
WILLIAM F. LEE
william.lee@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: (617) 526-6000
Facsimile: (617) 526-5000
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 858-6000
Facsimile: (650) 858-6100
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN JOSE DIVISION
16
17
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
21
22
23
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
KANADA DECL. ISO APPLE’S OPP. TO SAMSUNG’S MOT. IN LIMINE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3168430
Case No.
11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
DECLARATION OF
JOSEPH KANADA IN SUPPORT
OF APPLE’S OPPOSITION TO
SAMSUNG’S MOTIONS IN
LIMINE
1
I, JOSEPH KANADA, declare as follows:
2
1.
I am an associate in the law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP, counsel for Apple
3
Inc. (“Apple”). I am licensed to practice law in the State of California and admitted to practice
4
before this Court. Unless otherwise indicated, I have personal knowledge of the matters stated
5
herein or understand them to be true from members of my litigation team. I make this declaration
6
in support of Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motions in Limine.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the
document produced at SAMNDCA10809390.
3.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the
document produced at SAMNDCA11374409.
4.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the
document produced at SAMNDCA11010883.
5.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the
document produced at SAMNDCA 110300081.
6.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the
expert report of Peter Bressler, FIDSA, dated April 16, 2012.
7.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the
transcript of the February 17, 2012 deposition of Don Joo Lee.
8.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from
Plaintiff’s Trial Exhibit 26.
9.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from
Samsung’s Draft Jury Instructions.
10.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 9 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the
transcript of the February 24, 2012 deposition of Sangeun Lee.
11.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 10 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the
transcript of the February 22, 2012 deposition of Timothy Benner.
12.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 11 is a true and correct copy of Apple’s Response to
Interrogatory 5, dated March 4, 2012.
KANADA DECL. ISO APPLE’S OPP. TO SAMSUNG’S MOT. IN LIMINE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3168430
1
1
13.
Samsung’s expert on ergonomic issues, Mark Lehto, presented numerous
2
arguments in his expert report relating to the purported functionality of Apple’s design patents
3
and trade dress. Many of those arguments were disclosed by Samsung for the first time in its
4
March 7, 2012 response to Apple’s Interrogatory No. 40. Despite the timing of this disclosure,
5
Apple did not move to strike any portion of Mark Lehto’s expert report.
6
7
14.
expert report of Robert Anders, IDSA, dated April 16, 2012.
8
9
10
Attached hereto as Exhibit 12 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the
15.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 13 is a true and correct copy of a press release on the
Samsung website, available at http://www.samsung.com/us/news/newsRead.do?news_seq=19816
and accessed on July 10, 2012.
11
16.
Attached as Exhibit 14 is a true and correct copy of information from Samsung’s
12
website regarding the Galaxy S 4G, available at http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-
13
phones/SGH-T959HABTMB-buy and accessed on July 8, 2012.
14
17.
Attached as Exhibit 15 is a true and correct copy of information from Samsung’s
15
website regarding the Infuse 4G, available at http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-
16
phones/SGH-I997ZKAATT and accessed on July 8, 2012.
17
18.
Attached as Exhibit 16 is a true and correct copy of information from Samsung’s
18
website regarding the Tab 7 Plus, available at http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/galaxy-
19
tab/GT-P6210MAYXAR-buy and accessed on July 8, 2012.
20
19.
Attached as Exhibit 17 is a true and correct copy of information from Samsung’s
21
website regarding the Tab 7.7, available at http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/galaxy-tab/SCH-
22
I815LSAVZW-buy and accessed on July 8, 2012.
23
20.
Attached as Exhibits 18 and 19 are true and correct copies of information from
24
Samsung’s website regarding the Captivate with Android 2.3, available at
25
http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SGH-I897ZKAATT &
26
http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SGH-I897ZKAATT-buy and accessed on July 9,
27
2012.
28
KANADA DECL. ISO APPLE’S OPP. TO SAMSUNG’S MOT. IN LIMINE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3168430
2
1
21.
Attached as Exhibits 20 and 21 are true and correct copies of information from
2
Samsung’s website regarding the Droid Charge with Android 2.2, available at
3
http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SCH-I510RAAVZW &
4
http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SCH-I510RAAVZW-buy and accessed on
5
July 9, 2012.
6
22.
Attached as Exhibits 22 and 23 are true and correct copies of information from
7
Samsung’s website regarding the Epic 4G with Android 2.3, available at
8
http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SPH-D700ZKASPR &
9
http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SPH-D700ZKASPR-buy and accessed on
10
11
July 9, 2012.
23.
Attached as Exhibits 24 and 25 are true and correct copies of information from
12
Samsung’s website regarding the Exhibit 4G with Android 2.3, available at
13
http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SGH-T759ZKBTMB &
14
http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SGH-T759ZKBTMB-buy and accessed on
15
July 9, 2012.
16
24.
Attached as Exhibits 26 and 27 are true and correct copies of information from
17
Samsung’s website regarding the Galaxy S 4G with Android 2.3, available at
18
http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SGH-T959HABTMB-features &
19
http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SGH-T959HABTMB-buy and accessed on
20
July 9, 2012.
21
25.
Attached as Exhibits 28 and 29 are true and correct copies of information from
22
Samsung’s website regarding the Galaxy S II (Epic 4G Touch) with Android 2.3.4, available at
23
http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SPH-D710ZKASPR-features &
24
http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SPH-D710ZKASPR-buy and accessed on
25
July 9, 2012.
26
26.
Attached as Exhibits 30 and 31 are true and correct copies of information from
27
Samsung’s website regarding the Gravity Smart with Android 2.2, available at
28
http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SGH-T589HBBTMB &
KANADA DECL. ISO APPLE’S OPP. TO SAMSUNG’S MOT. IN LIMINE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3168430
3
1
http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SGH-T589HBBTMB-buy and accessed on
2
July 9, 2012.
3
27.
Attached as Exhibits 32 and 33 are true and correct copies of information from
4
Samsung’s website regarding the Mesmerize with Android 2.1, available at
5
http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SCH-I500RKAUSC &
6
http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SCH-I500RKAUSC-buy and accessed on July 9,
7
2012.
8
28.
Attached as Exhibits 34 and 35 are true and correct copies of information from
9
Samsung’s website regarding the Nexus S with Android 2.3, available at
10
http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/GT-I9020PWAATT &
11
http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/GT-I9020PWAATT-buy and accessed on July 9,
12
2012.
13
29.
Attached as Exhibits 36 and 37 are true and correct copies of information from
14
Samsung’s website regarding the Replenish with Android 2.3, available at
15
http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SPH-M580ZKASPR &
16
http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SPH-M580ZKASPR-buy and accessed on
17
July 9, 2012.
18
30.
Attached as Exhibit 38 is a true and correct copy of information from Amazon’s
19
website regarding the Tab 8.9 LTE, available at
20
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B006O13O1Q/ref=asc_df_B006O13O1Q2088406?smid=A3H89AD
21
JHTH9SN&tag=cnet-pc-20.
22
23
24
25
26
27
31.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 39 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the
expert report of Ravin Balakrishnan, Ph.D., dated March 22, 2012.
32.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 40 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the
expert report of Karan Singh, Ph.D., dated March 22, 2012.
33.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 41 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt of the
transcript of the March 5, 2012 deposition of Jun Won Lee.
28
KANADA DECL. ISO APPLE’S OPP. TO SAMSUNG’S MOT. IN LIMINE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3168430
4
1
2
3
34.
The depositions of Jun Won Lee, Boris Teksler, and Chip Lutton addressed
Apple’s efforts to provide notice and explain its allegations.
35.
Apple produced documents relating to the negotiations with Samsung in the
4
summer and fall of 2010 in July 2011. Several of these documents were used as exhibits during
5
Chip Lutton’s deposition on July 26, 2011 and were incorporated into Samsung’s opposition to
6
Apple’s motion for a preliminary injunction in August 2011.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
36.
Attached as Exhibit 42 is a true and correct copy of Schedule 4.2 from the updated
Tab 2 to the expert report of Michael Wagner dated May 4, 2012.
37.
Attached as Exhibit 43 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the transcript
of the May 12, 2012 deposition of Michael Wagner.
38.
Attached as Exhibit 44 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the transcript
of the January 24, 2012 deposition of Timothy Sheppard.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this
10th day of July, 2012 at Palo Alto, California.
15
/s/ Joseph Kanada
Joseph Kanada
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
KANADA DECL. ISO APPLE’S OPP. TO SAMSUNG’S MOT. IN LIMINE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3168430
5
1
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE
2
I, Michael A. Jacobs, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
3
Declaration. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Joseph Kanada has
4
concurred in this filing.
5
6
Dated: July 10, 2012
/s/Michael A. Jacobs
Michael A. Jacobs
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
KANADA DECL. ISO APPLE’S OPP. TO SAMSUNG’S MOT. IN LIMINE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3168430
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?