Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1209

Declaration of John D'Amato in Support of #1208 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Oppositions to Apple's Motions in Limine filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to the D'Amato Declaration, #2 Exhibit B to the D'Amato Declaration, #3 Exhibit C to the D'Amato Declaration, #4 Exhibit D to the D'Amato Declaration, #5 Exhibit E to the D'Amato Declaration, #6 Exhibit F to the D'Amato Declaration, #7 Exhibit G to the D'Amato Declaration, #8 Exhibit H to the D'Amato Declaration, #9 Exhibit I to the D'Amato Declaration, #10 Exhibit J to the D'Amato Declaration)(Related document(s) #1208 ) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 7/10/2012)

Download PDF
D'AMATO DECLARATION EXHIBIT H FILED UNDER SEAL Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 255 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 2 3 4 5 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 6 Plaintiff, 7 vs. CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK 8 9 10 11 12 13 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants. ____________________________/ 14 15 H I G H L Y C O N F I D E N T I A L A T T O R N E Y S' E Y E S O N L Y 16 17 18 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF MICHAEL J. WAGNER VOLUME II PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA SATURDAY, MAY 12, 2012 19 20 21 22 BY: ANDREA M. IGNACIO HOWARD, CSR, RPR, CCRR, CLR 23 CSR LICENSE NO. 9830 24 JOB NO. 49053 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 513 1 entire market value rule. 2 16:28 And that's what the law seems to say, and I 16:28 3 just have to accept -- even though I don't agree with 16:28 4 it, that's what the rule is. 16:28 5 Because it's not the entire revenue rule. 16:28 6 It's the entire market value rule, which to me is a 16:28 7 measure of profits and value. 16:28 8 apportionment, then I don't think it's the entire 16:28 9 value. 16:28 10 11 12 And yet if you do any But that's clearly not what the case law says and what judges say. Q 16:28 16:28 Well, you -- what is -- as you understand 16:28 13 what cases say, as long as you do an apportionment of 16:28 14 some type, you're meeting the rule? 16:28 15 A No. You -- even though you've done some 16:28 16 apportionment, that does not mean you're outside of 16:28 17 the entire market value rule. 16:28 18 total profits or sales of the product, you're until 16:29 19 there. 16:29 20 Q If you started from the 16:29 Your -- so your understanding as you're 21 I see. 16:29 22 applying it here for purposes of your criticisms of 16:29 23 Mr. Musika is that the entire market value rule just 16:29 24 prohibits starting with entire profitability at all? 16:29 25 A Correct. 16:29 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 514 1 Q 16:29 Let's -- let's turn, then, to the question of 2 All right. 16:29 3 how Mr. Musika calculates his income ranges for this 16:29 4 reference point. 16:29 5 Do you have a criticism of the methods he 16:29 6 uses to -- other than whether it qualifies under the 16:29 7 entire market value rule, whether it is appropriate -- 16:29 8 I'll stop there. 16:29 9 I don't think his method is 16:29 10 appropriate as based on what I've said in my report. 16:29 11 That, again, if you use his approach and just change 16:30 12 certain assumptions, and you do his approach and you 16:30 13 separate out iPad from iPhone, it just doesn't work. 16:30 14 I mean, he would show that Samsung has no value from 16:30 15 using these patents. 16:30 16 A Q Well, I -- yes. And what is it that causes you to believe 16:30 17 that you would change the -- what assumptions would 16:30 18 need to change in order for it to have no value? 16:30 19 20 A Well, the only assumption I think you need to change, which makes no sense 22 to me. 23 Apple, the worldwide tax rate. 24 25 16:30 He should be using, just like he does for 16:30 16:30 And if you just make that one change, my recollection is it's -- using his approach, Samsung is TSG Reporting - Worldwide 16:30 877-702-9580 16:30 16:30 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 515 1 2 generating no value from these patents. Q Do you -- have you actually identified 16:30 16:30 3 through discussions with Samsung what tax rate they 16:30 4 pay all in on the Accused Products? 16:30 5 A No. I just know it's pursuant to a 16:31 6 negotiation with the federal government as to 16:31 7 arm's-length transfer pricing. 16:31 8 9 Q And do you have any reason to disagree with 16:31 Mr. Sheppard's testimony that the amount of the profit 16:31 10 or the amount of the tax -- excuse me -- that the -- 16:31 11 let me strike all that. 16:31 12 13 16 17 25 Do you have any reason to disagree with 16:31 Mr. Sheppard's testimony A I'd need more information to know; but no. 16:31 He clearly has better information than I do. Q Well, do you have -- certainly, you don't TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 16:32 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 516 1 have any better information regarding Samsung's U.S. 16:32 2 tax rate than Mr. Sheppard? 16:32 3 A That's true. 16:32 4 Q Why do you believe that the use of -- let me 16:32 5 back up. 6 7 16:32 You agree that the U.S. tax rate is a relevant question; correct? 16:32 16:32 8 A I believe it's relevant. 16:32 9 Q The -- so why can't you believe that the 16:33 10 21 government would do that? Q 16:33 When you say the same as any U.S. company, 16:33 22 you're talking about, like, a General Electric or 16:33 23 other companies that operate in the U.S.? 16:33 24 25 A Well, that's a bad example because they are international, and they have all the same issues that TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 16:33 16:33

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?