Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1209
Declaration of John D'Amato in Support of #1208 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Oppositions to Apple's Motions in Limine filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to the D'Amato Declaration, #2 Exhibit B to the D'Amato Declaration, #3 Exhibit C to the D'Amato Declaration, #4 Exhibit D to the D'Amato Declaration, #5 Exhibit E to the D'Amato Declaration, #6 Exhibit F to the D'Amato Declaration, #7 Exhibit G to the D'Amato Declaration, #8 Exhibit H to the D'Amato Declaration, #9 Exhibit I to the D'Amato Declaration, #10 Exhibit J to the D'Amato Declaration)(Related document(s) #1208 ) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 7/10/2012)
D'AMATO DECLARATION
EXHIBIT H
FILED UNDER SEAL
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
Page 255
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
2
3
4
5
APPLE INC., a California
corporation,
6
Plaintiff,
7
vs.
CASE NO.
11-cv-01846-LHK
8
9
10
11
12
13
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
LTD., a Korean business
entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA,INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company,
Defendants.
____________________________/
14
15
H I G H L Y
C O N F I D E N T I A L
A T T O R N E Y S' E Y E S O N L Y
16
17
18
VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF MICHAEL J. WAGNER
VOLUME II
PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA
SATURDAY, MAY 12, 2012
19
20
21
22
BY:
ANDREA M. IGNACIO HOWARD, CSR, RPR, CCRR, CLR
23
CSR LICENSE NO. 9830
24
JOB NO. 49053
25
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
877-702-9580
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
Page 513
1
entire market value rule.
2
16:28
And that's what the law seems to say, and I
16:28
3
just have to accept -- even though I don't agree with
16:28
4
it, that's what the rule is.
16:28
5
Because it's not the entire revenue rule.
16:28
6
It's the entire market value rule, which to me is a
16:28
7
measure of profits and value.
16:28
8
apportionment, then I don't think it's the entire
16:28
9
value.
16:28
10
11
12
And yet if you do any
But that's clearly not what the case law says
and what judges say.
Q
16:28
16:28
Well, you -- what is -- as you understand
16:28
13
what cases say, as long as you do an apportionment of
16:28
14
some type, you're meeting the rule?
16:28
15
A
No.
You -- even though you've done some
16:28
16
apportionment, that does not mean you're outside of
16:28
17
the entire market value rule.
16:28
18
total profits or sales of the product, you're until
16:29
19
there.
16:29
20
Q
If you started from the
16:29
Your -- so your understanding as you're
21
I see.
16:29
22
applying it here for purposes of your criticisms of
16:29
23
Mr. Musika is that the entire market value rule just
16:29
24
prohibits starting with entire profitability at all?
16:29
25
A
Correct.
16:29
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
877-702-9580
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
Page 514
1
Q
16:29
Let's -- let's turn, then, to the question of
2
All right.
16:29
3
how Mr. Musika calculates his income ranges for this
16:29
4
reference point.
16:29
5
Do you have a criticism of the methods he
16:29
6
uses to -- other than whether it qualifies under the
16:29
7
entire market value rule, whether it is appropriate --
16:29
8
I'll stop there.
16:29
9
I don't think his method is
16:29
10
appropriate as based on what I've said in my report.
16:29
11
That, again, if you use his approach and just change
16:30
12
certain assumptions, and you do his approach and you
16:30
13
separate out iPad from iPhone, it just doesn't work.
16:30
14
I mean, he would show that Samsung has no value from
16:30
15
using these patents.
16:30
16
A
Q
Well, I -- yes.
And what is it that causes you to believe
16:30
17
that you would change the -- what assumptions would
16:30
18
need to change in order for it to have no value?
16:30
19
20
A
Well, the only assumption I think you need to
change,
which makes no sense
22
to me.
23
Apple, the worldwide tax rate.
24
25
16:30
He should be using, just like he does for
16:30
16:30
And if you just make that one change, my
recollection is it's -- using his approach, Samsung is
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
16:30
877-702-9580
16:30
16:30
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
Page 515
1
2
generating no value from these patents.
Q
Do you -- have you actually identified
16:30
16:30
3
through discussions with Samsung what tax rate they
16:30
4
pay all in on the Accused Products?
16:30
5
A
No.
I just know it's pursuant to a
16:31
6
negotiation with the federal government as to
16:31
7
arm's-length transfer pricing.
16:31
8
9
Q
And do you have any reason to disagree with
16:31
Mr. Sheppard's testimony that the amount of the profit
16:31
10
or the amount of the tax -- excuse me -- that the --
16:31
11
let me strike all that.
16:31
12
13
16
17
25
Do you have any reason to disagree with
16:31
Mr. Sheppard's testimony
A
I'd need more information to know; but no.
16:31
He clearly has better information than I do.
Q
Well, do you have -- certainly, you don't
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
877-702-9580
16:32
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
Page 516
1
have any better information regarding Samsung's U.S.
16:32
2
tax rate than Mr. Sheppard?
16:32
3
A
That's true.
16:32
4
Q
Why do you believe that the use of -- let me
16:32
5
back up.
6
7
16:32
You agree that the U.S. tax rate is a
relevant question; correct?
16:32
16:32
8
A
I believe it's relevant.
16:32
9
Q
The -- so why can't you believe that the
16:33
10
21
government would do that?
Q
16:33
When you say the same as any U.S. company,
16:33
22
you're talking about, like, a General Electric or
16:33
23
other companies that operate in the U.S.?
16:33
24
25
A
Well, that's a bad example because they are
international, and they have all the same issues that
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
877-702-9580
16:33
16:33
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?