Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1233

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Declaration of Thomas Watson in Support of Samsung's Proposed Jury Instructions filed by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Watson Declaration, #3 Ex. A, #4 Ex. B, #5 Ex. C, #6 Ex. D)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 7/13/2012)

EXHIBIT A

1
2
3
4
5
6

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
[e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9
10
11

MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
WILLIAM F. LEE (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.

12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN JOSE DIVISION
15
16

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,

17
18
19
20
21
22

v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.

23
24
25
26
27
28
APPLE INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3017026

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
APPLE INC.'S INITIAL
DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO
RULE 26(A)(1)

1

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1), Plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”)

2

makes the following initial disclosures to Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, Samsung

3

Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively,

4

“Samsung”).

5

Apple provides these disclosures subject to and without waiving any applicable privilege,

6

doctrine, or right, including without limitation the attorney-client privilege, the work product

7

doctrine, and all other rights and privileges recognized under the laws of the United States, the

8

State of California and all relevant jurisdictions. By these disclosures, Apple does not concede

9

the relevance or admissibility of any particular information. Apple makes these disclosures based

10

on information currently available to it. Apple reserves the right to amend or supplement these

11

disclosures and to present additional evidence to support its claims and defenses with any filing or

12

during any proceeding in this action, including trial.

13

I.

14

INDIVIDUALS LIKELY TO HAVE DISCOVERABLE INFORMATION
[Fed R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A)(i)]

15

Apple identifies the following individuals who may have discoverable information that

16

Apple may use to support its claims, defenses, or counterclaims in this action (unless solely for

17

impeachment). Samsung should contact any current or former Apple employee, agent, or other

18

representative only through Apple’s counsel of record.

19
20

Name

Contact

Potential area(s) of knowledge (at
least)

Inventors of the Apple
design patents-in-suit,
including:

Apple Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino, CA 95014
[contact through
counsel]

The Apple patents-in-suit, including,
conception, reduction to practice, and
inventorship; Apple products
embodying the inventions claimed by
the pertinent Apple patents-in-suit;
other Apple products; functionality of
the asserted trade dress; selection of
the asserted trade dress

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Imran Chaudhri (7,853,891;
7,864,163; D627,790;
D617,334; D604,305)
Bartley Andre (D504,889;
D622,270; D618,677;
D593,087)

28
APPLE INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3017026

1

1

Name

2
3

Potential area(s) of knowledge (at
least)

Freddy Anzures (D604,305)

4

Contact

Daniel Coster (D504,889;
D622,270; D618,677;
D593,087)

5
6
7

Daniele De Iuliis
(D504,889; D622,270;
D618,677; D593,087)

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Richard Howarth
(D504,889; D622,270;
D618,677; D593,087)
Jonathan Ive (D504,889;
D622,270; D618,677;
D593,087)
Duncan Kerr (D504,889;
D622,270; D618,677;
D593,087)
Shin Nishibori (D504,889;
D622,270; D618,677;
D593,087)
Matthew Rohrbach
(D504,889; D622,270;
D618,677; D593,087)

19
20
21
22

Peter Russell-Clark
(D622,270)
Douglas Satzger (D504,889;
D622,270; D618,677;
D593,087)

23
24
25
26
27

Calvin Seid (D504,889;
D622,270; D618,677;
D593,087)
Christopher Stringer
(D504,889; D622,270;
D618,677; D593,087)

28
APPLE INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3017026

2

1

Name

Contact

Potential area(s) of knowledge (at
least)

Apple Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino, CA 95014
[contact through
counsel]

The pertinent Apple patents-in-suit,
including, conception, reduction to
practice, and inventorship; Apple
products embodying the inventions
claimed by the pertinent Apple
patents-in-suit; other Apple products

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Eugene Whang (D504,889;
D622,270; D618,677;
D593,087)
Rico Zörkendörfer
(D504,889; D622,270;
D618,677; D593,087)
Inventors of the Apple
utility patents-in-suit,
including:
Chris Blumenberg
(7,864,163)

12

Steven W. Christensen
(6,493,002)

13

Greg Christie (7,864,163)

14

John Elias (7,812,828)

15

Scott Forstall (7,864,163)

16
17

Steve Hotelling (7,663,607;
7,920,129)

18

Scott Herz (7,844,915)

19

Brian Huppi (7,663,607)

20

Brian Land (7,920,129)

21

Stephen Lemay (7,864,163)

22

Bas Ording (7,469,381;
7,853,891; 7,864,163)

23
24

Andrew Platzer (7,844,915)

25

Joshua Strickon (7,663,607)

26

Marcel Van Os (7,864,163)

27

Wayne Westerman
(7,812,828)

28

APPLE INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3017026

3

1

Name

Contact

Potential area(s) of knowledge (at
least)

Sissie Twiggs

Apple Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino, CA 95014
[contact through
counsel]

Advertising of Apple products

Art Rangel

Apple Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino, CA 95014
[contact through
counsel]

Damages and irreparable harm to
Apple

Phil Schiller

Apple Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino, CA 95014
[contact through
counsel]

Apple’s iPhone and iPad business

Bruce Sewell

Apple Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino, CA 95014
[contact through
counsel]

License negotiations between Apple
and Samsung

Greg Joswiak

Apple Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino, CA 95014
[contact through
counsel]

iPod, iPhone & iOS product
marketing; history and business of
Apple

Eric Jue

Apple Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino, CA 95014
[contact through
counsel]

iPhone marketing

Stan Ng

Apple Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino, CA 95014
[contact through
counsel]

iPod, iPhone & iOS product
marketing

2
3

Richard Williamson
(7,864,163)

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
APPLE INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3017026

4

1

Name

Contact

Potential area(s) of knowledge (at
least)

Michael Tchao

Apple Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino, CA 95014
[contact through
counsel]

iPad Marketing

Mark Buckley

Apple Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino, CA 95014
[contact through
counsel]

Damages and irreparable harm to
Apple

Richard Lutton

Apple Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino, CA 95014
[contact through
counsel]

Prosecution and licensing of Apple’s
patents-in-suit; license negotiations
between Apple and Samsung

Boris Teksler

Apple Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino, CA 95014
[contact through
counsel]

License negotiations between Apple
and Samsung

Jason Shi

Apple Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino, CA 95014
[contact through
counsel]

UMTS implementation in Apple
products

Morgan Grainger

Apple Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino, CA 95014
[contact through
counsel]

Design and operation of accused
functionality in accused Apple
products

George Dicker

Apple Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino, CA 95014
[contact through
counsel]

Design and operation of accused
functionality in accused Apple
products

Justin Santamaria

Apple Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino, CA 95014

Design and operation of accused
functionality in accused Apple
products

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
APPLE INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3017026

5

1

Name

Contact

2

Potential area(s) of knowledge (at
least)

[contact through
counsel]

3
4
5

Thomas Alsina

Apple Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino, CA 95014
[contact through
counsel]

Design and operation of accused
functionality in accused Apple
products

Michael Mallie

Blakely, Sokoloff,
Taylor & Zafman LLP
1279 Oakmead Parkway
Sunnyvale, CA 94085

Prosecution of Apple’s utility patentsin-suit, including at least U.S. Patent
No. 6,493,002

Robert Beyers

Morgan, Lewis &
Bockius LLP
2 Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real,
Suite 700
Palo Alto, CA 94306

Prosecution of Apple’s utility patentsin-suit, including at least U.S. Patent
Nos. 7,469,381 & U.S. 7,684,163

Glenn Kubota

Morrison & Foerster
LLP
555 West Fifth Street
Suite 3500
Los Angeles, CA 90013

Prosecution of Apple’s utility patentsin-suit, including at least U.S. Patent
Nos. 7,663,607, 7,812,828 &
7,920,129

James Scheller

Blakely, Sokoloff,
Taylor & Zafman LLP
1279 Oakmead Parkway
Sunnyvale, CA 94085

Prosecution of Apple’s utility patentsin-suit, including at least U.S. Patent
Nos. 7,844,915 & 7,853,891

Tracy-Gene Durkin

Sterne, Kessler,
Goldstein, & Fox PLLC
1100 New York Avenue
Washington, DC 20005

Prosecution of Apple’s design patentsin-suit

Inventors of the Samsung
Patents-in-Suit, including:

Unknown

Upon information and belief, the
Samsung Patents-in-Suit, including,
conception, reduction to practice, and
inventorship

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Joon-Young Cho
(7,447,516)

27
28

Gin-Kyu Choi (7,200,792)
APPLE INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3017026

6

1

Name

2
3

Contact

Potential area(s) of knowledge (at
least)

Soon-Jae Choi (7,050,410;
7,386,001)

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Sung-ho Eun (7,577,460)
Youn-Hyoung Heo
(7,447,516)
Joong-Ho Jeong (6,928,604)
Moon-Sang Jeong
(7,698,711)
Beong-Jo Kim (7,050,410;
7,386,001)

12

Hee-Won Kang (7,362,867)

13

Hun-Kee Kim (7,200,792)

14

Jae-Yoel Kim (7,362,867)

15

Min-Goo Kim (7,050,410;
7,386,001)

16
17
18
19
20

Noh-Sun Kim (7,200,792)
Pyung-soo Kim (7,079,871)
Se-Hyoung Kim (7,050,410;
7,386,001)
Soeng-Hun Kim (7,675,941)

21
Yong-Jun Kwak (7,447,516)
22
23

Young-Bum Kim
(7,447,516)

24

Hye-Young Lee (7,069,055)

25
26

Hyeon-Woo Lee
(7,069,055)

27

Ju-Ho Lee (7,447,516)

28
APPLE INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3017026

7

1

Name

Contact

Potential area(s) of knowledge (at
least)

Upon information and
belief:

Upon information and belief, the
prosecution of the Samsung Patentsin-Suit, including at least U.S. Patent
No. 7,577,460

2
3

Jun-Sung Lee (7,200,792)

4

Young-Hwan Lee
(7,386,001)

5
6
7
8

Yong-Suk Moon
(7,200,792)
Chang-Soo Park (6,928,604)
Hyuk-soo Son (7,456,893)

9
10
11

Himke Van Der Velde
(7,675,941)

12

Gert-Jan Van Lieshout
(7,675,941)

13

Jae-Seung Yoon (7,200,792)

14

Rocco S. Barrese

15
Dilworth & Barrese,
LLP
1000 Woodbury Road
Suite 405
Woodbury, NY 11797

16
17
18
19

Michael A. Bush

Unknown

Upon information and belief, the
prosecution of the Samsung Patentsin-Suit, including at least U.S. Patent
No. 7,079,871

Simon G. Booth

Upon information and
belief:

Upon information and belief, the
prosecution of the Samsung Patentsin-Suit, including at least U.S. Patent
No. 7,675,941

20
21
22
23
Roylance, Abrams,
Berdo & Goodman LLP
1300 19th Street, NW
Suite 600
Washington D.C. 20036

24
25
26
27

Frank Chau

Unknown

Upon information and belief, the
prosecution of the Samsung Patents-

28
APPLE INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3017026

8

1

Name

Contact

2

Potential area(s) of knowledge (at
least)
in-Suit, including at least U.S. Patent
No. 7,069,055

3
4
5

Peter G. Dilworth

6

Upon information and
belief:
Dilworth & Barrese,
LLP
1000 Woodbury Road
Suite 405
Woodbury, NY 11797

7
8
9

Upon information and belief, the
prosecution of the Samsung Patentsin-Suit, including at least U.S. Patent
Nos. 7,069,055 and 7,577,460

George C. Eckert

Unknown

Upon information and belief, the
prosecution of the Samsung Patentsin-Suit, including at least U.S.
7,698,711

Paul J. Farrell

10

Upon information and
belief:

Upon information and belief, the
prosecution of Samsung Patents-inSuit, including at least U.S. Patent
Nos. 7,050,410, 6,928,604, 7,200,792,
7,362,867, 7,386,001, 7,069,055, &
7,577,460

11
12
13
14

The Farrell Law Firm,
P.C.
290 Broadhollow Road,
Suite 210E
Melville, New York
11747

15
16
17
18

John E. Holmes

19

Roylance, Abrams,
Berdo & Goodman LLP
1300 19th Street, NW
Suite 600
Washington D.C. 20036

20
21
22
23

Upon information and
belief:

Blandon S. Bludau

24
25

Upon information and
belief:
Roylance, Abrams,
Berdo & Goodman LLP
1300 19th Street, NW
Suite 600
Washington D.C. 20036

26
27

Upon information and belief, the
prosecution of the Samsung Patentsin-Suit, including at least U.S. Patent
Nos. 7,675,941, 7,698,711, and
7,447,516

Upon information and belief, the
prosecution of the Samsung Patentsin-Suit, including at least U.S.
7,698,711

28
APPLE INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3017026

9

1

Name

Contact

Potential area(s) of knowledge (at
least)

Dana D. Ivey

Unknown

Upon information and belief, the
prosecution of the Samsung Patentsin-Suit, including at least U.S. Patent
No. 7,675,941

Peter L. Kendall

Unknown

Upon information and belief, the
prosecution of the Samsung Patentsin-Suit, including at least U.S. Patent
No. 7,447,516

Stacy J. Longanecker

Upon information and
belief:

Upon information and belief, the
prosecution of the Samsung Patentsin-Suit, including at least U.S. Patent
No. 7,675,941

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Roylance, Abrams,
Berdo & Goodman LLP
1300 19th Street, NW
Suite 600
Washington D.C. 20036

12
13
14
15

Jundong Ma

Upon information and
belief:

16
Roylance, Abrams,
Berdo & Goodman LLP
1300 19th Street, NW
Suite 600
Washington D.C. 20036

17
18
19
20

Christian C. Michel

Upon information and
belief:

21
Roylance, Abrams,
Berdo & Goodman LLP
1300 19th Street, NW
Suite 600
Washington D.C. 20036

22
23
24
25

Upon information and belief, the
prosecution of the Samsung Patentsin-Suit, including at least U.S. Patent
No. 7,675,941

David R. Morris

Unknown

Upon information and belief, the
prosecution of the Samsung Patentsin-Suit, including at least U.S. Patent
No. 7,456,893

Michael J. Musella

Upon information and

Upon information and belief, the

26
27
28

Upon information and belief, the
prosecution of the Samsung Patentsin-Suit, including at least U.S. Patent
No. 7,447,516

APPLE INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3017026

10

1

Name

Contact

Potential area(s) of knowledge (at
least)

3

belief:

4

Dilworth & Barrese,
LLP
1000 Woodbury Road
Suite 405
Woodbury, NY 11797

prosecution of the Samsung Patentsin-Suit, including at least U.S. Patent
Nos. 7,200,792, 6,928,604, 7,362,867,
7,386,001, and 7,577,460

2

5
6
7
8

Raymond B. Persino

Unknown

Upon information and belief, the
prosecution of the Samsung Patentsin-Suit, including at least U.S. Patent
No. 7,447,516

Brian C. Rupp

Upon information and
belief:

The prosecution of the Samsung
Patents-in-Suit, including at least U.S.
Patent No. 7,456,893

9
10
11
12
Drinker Biddle & Reath
LLP
191 N. Wacker Dr., Ste.
3700
Chicago, IL 60606-1698

13
14
15
16

Maeng-Ho Shin

Unknown

Upon information and belief, the
prosecution of the Samsung Patentsin-Suit, including at least U.S. Patent
No. 7,447,516

Michael D. Stein

Unknown

Upon information and belief, the
prosecution of the Samsung Patentsin-Suit, including at least U.S. Patent
No. 7,079,871

Daniel E. Tierney

Unknown

Upon information and belief, the
prosecution of the Samsung Patentsin-Suit, including at least U.S. Patent
No. 7,200,792, 6,928,604, and
7,069,055

Stanislav Torgovitsky

Upon information and
belief:

Upon information and belief, the
prosecution of the Samsung Patentsin-Suit, including at least U.S. Patent
No. 7,675,941

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Roylance, Abrams,
Berdo & Goodman LLP
1300 19th Street, NW

27
28
APPLE INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3017026

11

1

Name

Contact

2

Potential area(s) of knowledge (at
least)

Suite 600
Washington D.C. 20036

3
4
5

Richard A. Wulff

Unknown

Upon information and belief, the
prosecution of the Samsung Patentsin-Suit, including at least U.S. Patent
No. 7,456,893

Seung Ho Ahn

Believed to be a current
Samsung employee

License negotiations between Apple
and Samsung

JY Lee

Believed to be a current
Samsung employee

License negotiations between Apple
and Samsung

Kwang Jun Kim

Believed to be a current
Samsung employee

License negotiations between Apple
and Samsung

Employees of Infineon
Technologies AG and/or
Intel Corporation

Infineon Technologies
AG
Am Campeon 1-12
85579 Neubiberg
Germany

UMTS implementation in chips
supplied to Apple; any licensing of the
Samsung Patents-in-Suit

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Intel Corporation
2200 Mission College
Blvd.
Santa Clara, CA 95054

16
17
18
19

In addition to the individuals identified above, the following individuals may have
20
discoverable information: (i) persons deposed during this litigation and persons identified during
21
such depositions; (ii) persons identified in Samsung’s Initial Disclosures; and (iii) other
22
individuals at Samsung.
23
Apple will identify any testifying expert witnesses as required by Rule 26(a)(2) and any
24
applicable Local Rule or order of the Court.
25
26

II.

DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENTS [Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A)(ii)]
Apple identifies the following documents, electronically stored information, and tangible

27
things in its possession, custody, or control that it may use to support its claims and defenses
28
APPLE INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3017026

12

1

(unless solely for impeachment). Concurrently with service of these Initial Disclosures, Apple is

2

producing to Samsung documents in its possession relating to one or more of these categories.

3

•

4
5

File histories and prior art references cited by the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office during prosecution of the Apple patents asserted in the Amended Complaint

•

Documents, prototypes, and source code reflecting the conception and reduction to

6

practice of the inventions claimed in the Apple patents asserted in the Amended

7

Complaint

8

•

9
10

asserted in the Amended Complaint
•

11
12

Documents reflecting the damages and irreparable harm resulting from Samsung’s
willful infringement of the Apple patents asserted in the Amended Complaint

•

13
14

Documents reflecting Samsung’s willful infringement of the Apple patents

File histories for the trade dress and trademark registrations asserted in the
Amended Complaint

•

15

Documents reflecting the selection of the trademarks asserted in the Amended
Complaint

16

•

Prior art to the Samsung Patents-in-Suit

17

•

File histories of the Samsung Patents-in-Suit

18

•

Documents depicting the design, structure, and operation of accused functionality

19

or components of the Apple products accused of infringing the Samsung Patents-

20

in-Suit (“accused Apple products”)

21

•

22

Documents sufficient to show various financial information for the accused Apple
products

23

•

24

Apple reserves the right to object to the production of documents on any basis, including

Documents reflecting license negotiations between Apple and Samsung

25

that the information sought: (i) is not relevant; (ii) is protected from disclosure by an applicable

26

privilege, doctrine, or immunity; (iii) would be unduly burdensome or expensive to produce; (iv)

27

contains third party confidential information and cannot be produced without that party’s

28
APPLE INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3017026

13

1

notification and consent; or (v) constitutes proprietary or trade secret information that should not

2

be produced before an appropriate protective order has been entered.

3

Apple’ investigation for discoverable information that it may use to support its claims or

4

defenses in this litigation is ongoing. Apple also may rely on documents that are produced by any

5

party to this litigation, including Apple itself and Samsung.

6

III.

COMPUTATION OF DAMAGES [Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A)(iii)]

7

Pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(iii), Apple intends to seek an accounting for damages,

8

enhanced or treble damages for Samsung’s deliberate and willful infringement, and pre- and post-

9

judgment interest, in addition to a preliminary and permanent injunction. However, the amount

10

of damages arising from Samsung’s willful infringement is not ascertainable at this time, some or

11

all of the injuries are ongoing, and the computation of damages may require discovery and expert

12

testimony. Apple also claims damages as a result of Samsung’s anticompetitive conduct and

13

unlawful business acts and practices, including its failure to offer Apple a license on fair,

14

reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms to Samsung’s claimed standards-essential

15

patents. In addition, pursuant to Section 4 of the Clayton Act and/or Section 16750 of the

16

California Business and Professions Code, Apple is entitled to treble the amount of its actual

17

damages suffered as a result of Samsung’s conduct and all reasonable attorneys fees and costs.

18

Apple does not believe that Samsung has suffered any damages as a result of any conduct

19

by Apple. Apple intends to seek its attorneys fees and costs and other relief as is deemed

20

appropriate. These fees and costs and amount of any other relief that may be deemed appropriate

21

are not susceptible to calculation at this time.

22

IV.

23

INSURANCE AGREEMENTS [Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A)(iv)]
Apple is currently unaware of any insurance agreement under which an insurance business

24

may be liable to satisfy all or part of a possible judgment in this action or to indemnify or

25

reimburse Apple for payments made to satisfy such a judgment.

26
27
28
APPLE INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3017026

14

1
Dated: August 26, 2011

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

2
By:

3
4

/s/ Michael A. Jacobs
Michael A. Jacobs
Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.

5
6
7

Dated: August 26, 2011

8

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP

9

By:

10

/s/ Mark D. Selwyn
Mark D. Selwyn
Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
APPLE INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3017026

15