Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1319

Declaration of GiHo Ro in Support of 1318 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Dkt. Nos. 927, 991, 1013, 1022, 1060, and 1206 filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Prashanth Chennakesavan, # 2 Exhibit to Chennakesavan Declaration)(Related document(s) 1318 ) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 7/25/2012)

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151)  charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor  San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600  Facsimile: (415) 875-6700  Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129) kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com  Victoria F. Maroulis (Bar No. 202603) victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com th  555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5 Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139  Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100  Michael T. Zeller (Bar No. 196417)  michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor  Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000  Facsimile: (213) 443-3100  Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,  INC. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION   APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK  DECLARATION OF PRASHANTH CHENNAKESAVAN IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL  Plaintiff, vs.  SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG  ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG  TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,  Defendant.  Date: Time: Place: Judge: July 27, 2012 3:00 p.m. Courtroom 8, 4th Floor Hon. Lucy H. Koh   02198.51855/4873814.2 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK DECLARATION OF PRASHANTH CHENNAKESAVAN 1 I, Prashanth Chennakesavan, declare:  1. I am an associate with the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP,  counsel for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung  Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively “Samsung”). I have personal knowledge of the  facts set forth in this declaration and, if called upon as a witness, I could and would testify to such  facts under oath.  2. I make this declaration in support of Samsung’s Administrative Motions to File  Documents Under Seal.  3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a proposed redacted version of Samsung’s Notice  of Motion and Motion to Exclude Opinions of Certain of Apple’s Experts (Dkt. No. 927). The  portions of the document that Samsung requests be sealed are highlighted in yellow.  4. Attached hereto as Exhibits 2, 3, 4, and 5 are proposed redacted versions of  Exhibits 1, 3, 5, and 2, respectively, to the Declaration of Joby Martin in Support of Samsung’s  Motion to Exclude Opinions of Certain of Apple’s Experts (Dkt. No. 927). The portions of the  documents that Samsung requests be sealed are highlighted in yellow.  5. Attached hereto as Exhibits 6 and 7 are proposed redacted versions of Exhibits F  and G, respectively, to the Declaration of Terry Musika, CPA in Support of Apple’s Opposition to  Samsung’s Motion to Exclude Opinions of Certain of Apple’s Experts (Dkt. No. 991). The  portions of the documents that Samsung requests be sealed are highlighted in yellow.  6. Attached hereto as Exhibit 8 is a proposed redacted version of Exhibit O to the  Declaration of Michel Maharbiz, Ph.D. in Support of Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion  for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 1013). The portions of the document that Samsung requests be  sealed are highlighted in yellow.  7. Attached hereto as Exhibit 9 is a proposed redacted version of Exhibit 37 to the  Declaration of Peter Bressler in Support of Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for  Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 1022). The portions of the document that Samsung requests be  sealed are highlighted in yellow.  02198.51855/4873814.2 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK DECLARATION OF PRASHANTH CHENNAKESAVAN -1- 1 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit 10 is a proposed redacted version of Exhibit B to the 2 Declaration of Michael J. Wagner in Support of Samsung’s Motion to Strike Expert Testimony 3 Based on Undisclosed Facts and Theories (Dkt. No. 1060). The portions of the document that 4 Samsung requests be sealed are highlighted in yellow. 5 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit 11 is a proposed redacted version of Apple’s 6 Oppositions to Samsung’s Motions in Limine (Dkt. No. 1206). The portions of the document that 7 Samsung requests be sealed are highlighted in yellow. 8 10. Attached hereto as Exhibits 12, 13, and 14 are proposed redacted versions of 9 Exhibits 42, 43, and 44, respectively, to the Declaration of Joseph Kanada in Support of Apple’s 10 Oppositions to Samsung’s Motions in Limine (Dkt. No. 1206). The portions of the documents that 11 Samsung requests be sealed are highlighted in yellow. 12 13 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed in Los 14 Angeles, California on July 24, 2012. 15 16 /s/ Prashanth Chennakesavan 17 18 Prashanth Chennakesavan 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/4873814.2 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK DECLARATION OF PRASHANTH CHENNAKESAVAN -2- 1 GENERAL ORDER ATTESTATION 2 I, Victoria Maroulis, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file the 3 foregoing document. I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B. that concurrence in the 4 electronic filing of this document has been obtained from Prashanth Chennakesavan. 5 6 /s/ Victoria Maroulis 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/4873814.2 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK DECLARATION OF PRASHANTH CHENNAKESAVAN -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?