Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1330

OPPOSITION to ( 1318 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Dkt. Nos. 927, 991, 1013, 1022, 1060, and 1206, 1317 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Apple's Renewed Motion to Seal ) filed by Reuters America LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order)(Olson, Karl) (Filed on 7/25/2012) Modified text on 7/26/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

1

4

KARL OLSON (SBN 104760)
[e-mail]
RAM, OLSON, CEREGHINO & KOPCZYNSKI LLP
555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5

Attorneys for Third-Party REUTERS AMERICA LLC

2
3

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE

7
8

APPLE INC., a California corporation,

9

Plaintiff,
v.

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
RENEWED MOTIONS TO SEAL

10
11
12
13

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean Business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,

14

Date:
Time:
Place:
Judge:

July 27, 2012
3:00 p.m.
Courtroom 1, 5th Floor
Hon. Lucy H. Koh

Defendants.

15
16

On July 25, 2012, the parties filed renewed motions to seal following this court’s July 18

17

rejection of earlier administrative motions to seal. This Court at the Pretrial Conference on July

18

18, 2012 made it clear to the parties that other than third party source code, it would not seal

19

documents and that the trial would take place in the open. The Court now reaffirms that ruling

20

and holds that other than third party source code, as to which compelling reasons to seal exist,

21

none of the material the parties seek to seal, including financial information, shall be sealed. See

22

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1182 (9th Cir. 1182 [“The judge need

23

not document compelling reasons to unseal; rather the proponent of sealing bears the burden with

24

respect to unsealing. A failure to meet that burden means that the default posture of public access

25

prevails”].

26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
Judge, United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK – [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING RENEWED MOTIONS TO SEAL

1

1
2
3

N:\DOCS\1273-02\OppMotsSeal2-PropOrd.doc

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK – [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING RENEWED MOTIONS TO SEAL

2