Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1390

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Non-Party Microsoft Corporation's Motion to Seal Terms of Confidential License Agreement filed by Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Durrance, Nathaniel) (Filed on 7/26/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Ramsey M. Al-Salam, WSBA Bar No. 18822 RAlsalam@perkinscoie.com Nathaniel E. Durrance, CA Bar No. 229210 NDurrance@perkinscoie.com Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Telephone: 206.359.8000 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 Attorneys for Non-Party MICROSOFT CORPORATION 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 APPLE, INC., a California corporation, 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK NON-PARTY MICROSOFT CORPORATION'S MOTION TO SEAL CONFIDENTIAL LICENSE AND TERMS SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited company, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5 and this Court's Order Regarding Third Party Motions to Seal, ECF 1288 dated July 23, 2012, Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) moves the Court to seal and otherwise protect from public disclosure the terms of the confidential license 23 agreement ("Confidential Agreement") between Microsoft and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. 24 25 ("Samsung"). More specifically, Microsoft requests that the Confidential Agreement and its 26 terms be treated as "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY" under Section 27 9 of the Protective Order (ECF 687). 28 MICROSOFT CORPORATION'S MOTION TO SEAL CONFIDENTIAL LICENSE AND TERMS -1- 1 Confidential license agreements, such as the one that is the subject of this request, are 2 considered trade secrets in the Ninth Circuit and qualify for protection from public disclosure 3 under the "compelling reasons" test. Microsoft therefore requests that the Court seal and prevent 4 from public disclosure the terms of the Confidential Agreement, including in Court documents, 5 6 trial exhibits, and testimony. This request includes sealing of the license terms summary from the 7 Microsoft/Samsung Confidential Agreement found in Trial Exhibit 630, Expert Report of David 8 Teece, submitted by Samsung in this case. 9 10 11 Samsung, the other party to the confidential license agreement at issue, does not oppose this motion to seal. This motion is based upon the Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed in support 12 13 14 hereof and the Declaration of Tanya Moore. A proposed order is filed herewith. DATED: July 26, 2012 /s/ Nathaniel E. Durrance Ramsey M. Al-Salam, WSBA No. 18822 RAlsalam@perkinscoie.com Nathaniel E. Durrance, CA Bar No. 229210 NDurrance@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Tel: 206.359.8000/Fax: 206.359.9000 15 16 17 18 19 Attorneys for Microsoft Corporation 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MICROSOFT CORPORATION'S MOTION TO SEAL CONFIDENTIAL LICENSE AND TERMS -2- 1 Certificate of Service 2 3 I certify that on July 26, 2012, I caused the foregoing to be filed with the Clerk of the 4 Court using the Court’s ECF system, which will send notification of the filing to the attorney(s) 5 of record. 6 Dated: July 26, 2012. 7 /s/ Nathaniel E. Durrance Nathaniel E. Durrance 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MICROSOFT CORPORATION'S MOTION TO SEAL CONFIDENTIAL LICENSE AND TERMS -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?