Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1517

OBJECTIONS to Samsungs Objections to Apples Proposed Examination Exhibits and Materials for Third Day of Trial by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Hutnyan, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 7/31/2012)

EXHIBIT 1

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER; CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
OUTSIDE ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY INFORMATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
[e-mail]
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
[e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10
11
12

WILLIAM F. LEE
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN JOSE DIVISION

17
18

APPLE INC., a California corporation,

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Plaintiff,
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,

Case No.

11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)

APPLE INC.’S CORRECTED
AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND
RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.’S
INTERROGATORY NOS. 4, 6, 7,
16, 17, 18 TO APPLE INC.

Defendants.

26
27
28
APPLE’S CORRECTED AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S INTERROGATORY NOS. 4, 6, 7,
16, 17, 18 — CASE NO. 11-CV-01846 LHK (PSG)
sf-3115679

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER; CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
OUTSIDE ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY INFORMATION
1

In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d), Apple refers to the following

2

documents because the burden of deriving or ascertaining the answer to this Interrogatory from

3

the produced business records is substantially the same for Apple as for Samsung: APLNDC-

4

X0000007220, APLNDC00013715, and APLNDC00013690.

5

INTERROGATORY NO. 7:

6

Separately for each of the APPLE PATENTS-IN-SUIT, APPLE TRADE DRESS and

7

APPLE TRADEMARKS state all facts supporting any contention by APPLE that Samsung has

8

willfully infringed, diluted, or falsely designated the origin of its products for each patent, trade

9

dress, and trademark, including when and how APPLE asserts Samsung had actual notice of the

10

APPLE PATENTS-IN-SUIT, APPLE TRADE DRESS, and APPLE TRADEMARKS.

11

OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 7:

12

Apple objects to this Interrogatory as overbroad, unduly burdensome, and not reasonably

13

calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Apple objects to this Interrogatory as

14

premature to the extent that it: (a) conflicts with the schedule entered by the Court, (b) conflicts

15

with the obligations imposed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Civil Local Rules

16

and/or the Patent Local Rules of this Court, and/or any other applicable rule; (c) seeks

17

information that is the subject of expert testimony; (d) seeks information and/or responses that are

18

dependent on the Court’s construction of the asserted claims of the patents-in-suit; or (e) seeks

19

information and/or responses that are dependent on depositions and documents that have not been

20

taken or produced. Apple further objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it seeks information

21

that: (i) requires the disclosure of information, documents, and things protected from disclosure

22

by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, common interest doctrine, joint defense

23

privilege, or any other applicable privilege, doctrine, or immunity; (ii) would require Apple to

24

draw a legal conclusion to respond; (iii) is outside of Apple’s possession, custody, or control; or

25

(iv) can be obtained as easily by Samsung, is already in Samsung’s possession, or is publicly

26

available.

27
28

Subject to and incorporating its General Objections and its specific objections, Apple
responds as follows:
APPLE’S CORRECTED AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S INTERROGATORY NOS. 4, 6, 7,
16, 17, 18 — CASE NO. 11-CV-01846 LHK (PSG)
sf-3115679

6

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER; CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
OUTSIDE ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY INFORMATION
1

announcement of the iPad, and it was put on notice of Apple’s distinctive iPad 2 Trade Dress

2

upon the announcement of the iPad 2. Samsung was put on notice of the marks shown in U.S.

3

Registration Nos. 3,886,196; 3,889,642; 3,886,200; 3,889,685; and 3,886,169 upon the

4

announcement of the original iPhone. Samsung was put on notice of the mark shown in U.S.

5

Registration No. 3,886,197 at least as early as June 19, 2009. Samsung was put on notice of the

6

Purple iTunes Store Trademark at least as early as June 2008. Samsung was put on notice of the

7

iTunes Eighth Note and CD Design Trademark at least as early as January 9, 2001.

8

In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d), Apple refers to the following

9

documents because the burden of deriving or ascertaining the answer to this Interrogatory from

10

the produced business records is substantially the same for Apple as for Samsung:

11

SAMNDCA00036232, SAMNDCA00176053, SAMNDCA00191811, SAMNDCA00196646,

12

SAMNDCA00201351, SAMNDCA00201771, SAMNDCA00202212, SAMNDCA00202336,

13

SAMNDCA00203016, SAMNDCA00203092, SAMNDCA00203268, SAMNDCA00203727,

14

SAMNDCA00203811, SAMNDCA00203880, SAMNDCA00214274, SAMNDCA00217372,

15

SAMNDCA00221705, SAMNDCA00228887, SAMNDCA00228934, SAMNDCA00228981,

16

SAMNDCA00229011, SAMNDCA00229396, SAMNDCA00229399, SAMNDCA00229410,

17

SAMNDCA00229440, SAMNDCA00229449, SAMNDCA00232190, SAMNDCA00237929,

18

SAMNDCA00237976, SAMNDCA00238251, SAMNDCA00238432, SAMNDCA00249029,

19

SAMNDCA00251506, SAMNDCA00507826, SAMNDCA00508318, SAMNDCA00512454,

20

SAMNDCA00514511, SAMNDCA00514571, SAMNDCA00515899, SAMNDCA00525347,

21

SAMNDCA00530675, SAMNDCA00533129, SAMNDCA00533366, SAMNDCA10042955,

22

SAMNDCA10154003, SAMNDCA10190890, SAMNDCA10244357, SAMNDCA10244604,

23

SAMNDCA10247373, SAMNDCA10247537, SAMNDCA10247549, SAMNDCA10275576,

24

SAMNDCA10403697, SAMNDCA10524415, SAMNDCA10806650, SAMNDCA10806707,

25

SAMNDCA10807316, SAMNDCA10807388, SAMNDCA10808682, SAMNDCA10809390,

26

SAMNDCA10809734, SAMNDCA10824971, all documents referenced in Apple’s briefing on

27

its motion for sanctions, all documents that Samsung has produced, and continues to produce,

28
APPLE’S CORRECTED AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S INTERROGATORY NOS. 4, 6, 7,
16, 17, 18 — CASE NO. 11-CV-01846 LHK (PSG)
sf-3115679

9

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER; CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
OUTSIDE ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY INFORMATION
1

SAMNDCA00229410, SAMNDCA00229440, SAMNDCA00229449, SAMNDCA00232190,

2

SAMNDCA00237929, SAMNDCA00237976, SAMNDCA00238251, SAMNDCA00238432,

3

SAMNDCA00249029, SAMNDCA00251506, SAMNDCA00507826, SAMNDCA00508318,

4

SAMNDCA00512454, SAMNDCA00514511, SAMNDCA00514571, SAMNDCA00515899,

5

SAMNDCA00525347, SAMNDCA00530675, SAMNDCA00533129, SAMNDCA00533366,

6

SAMNDCA10042955, SAMNDCA10154003, SAMNDCA10190890, SAMNDCA10244357,

7

SAMNDCA10244604, SAMNDCA10247373, SAMNDCA10247537, SAMNDCA10247549,

8

SAMNDCA10275576, SAMNDCA10403697, SAMNDCA10524415, SAMNDCA10806650,

9

SAMNDCA10806707, SAMNDCA10807316, SAMNDCA10807388, SAMNDCA10808682,

10

SAMNDCA10809390, SAMNDCA10809734, SAMNDCA10824971, APLNDC-Y0000056158,

11

APLNDC-Y0000054603-55359, APLNDC-Y0000054364-54602, all documents referenced in

12

Apple’s briefing on its motion for sanctions, all documents that Samsung has produced, and

13

continues to produce, evidencing comparisons, analyses, studies, teardowns, and investigations of

14

Apple products, and other documents produced late by Samsung that Apple is still in the process

15

of reviewing.

16

Dated: March 9, 2012

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

17
18
19
20

By: /s/ Richard S.J. Hung
RICHARD S.J. HUNG
Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
APPLE’S CORRECTED AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO SAMSUNG’S INTERROGATORY NOS. 4, 6, 7,
16, 17, 18 — CASE NO. 11-CV-01846 LHK (PSG)
sf-3115679

15