Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1592
Declaration of Jason R. Bartlett in Support of 1591 Opposition/Response to Motion for Adverse Inference Jury Instruction filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11)(Related document(s) 1591 ) (Bartlett, Jason) (Filed on 8/6/2012)
425 MARKET STREET
SAN FRANCISCO
CALIFORNIA 94105-2482
TELEPHONE: 415.268.7000
FACSIMILE: 415.268.7522
MO RRI SO N & F O E RST E R L LP
N E W YO RK , SAN F RAN C I SCO ,
L O S A N G E L E S, P A L O A L T O ,
SAC RAME N T O , SAN D I E G O ,
D E N VE R, N O RT H E RN VI RG I N I A,
WASH I N G T O N , D .C.
T O K YO , L O N D O N , BR U SSE L S,
BE I JI N G , SH AN G H AI , H O N G K O N G
WWW.MOFO.COM
March 14, 2012
Writer’s Direct Contact
415.268.6615
JasonBartlett@mofo.com
By Email (dianehutnyan@quinnemanuel.com)
Diane Hutnyan
Quinn Emanuel
865 South Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017-2543
Re:
Apple v. Samsung, Case No. 11-cv-1846 LHK (N.D. Cal.)
Dear Diane:
I write in response to your March 2 letter regarding the deposition of Mark Buckley and
Apple’s production of financial documents. Your assertion that Apple has failed to produce
“basic financial documents relevant to the costs and profitability of the products Apple has
put at issue” is baseless.
The scope of Apple’s financial production has been the subject of many discussions and
addressed through motions. Apple identified documents various groups of documents in its
possession, custody and control that reflect units, sales, cost of goods sold, expenses, and
various measures of profitability. It identified documents regarding price, customers, and
other categories of financial information. It identified combinations of documents prepared
in the ordinary course by various financial teams within Apple as well as unique data not
available elsewhere that could be obtained from the system of record. The Court concluded
that the scope of Apple’s proposed response was reasonable. (Order re Discovery Motions
[Dkt. No. 673] at 21.)
Thereafter, Apple has produced the following non-exclusive list of materials related to its
sales, costs and financial performance:
Line of Business Reports for iPhone, iPad, iPod Touch, iTunes, Licensing, Mobile
Advertising, iPhone accessories, iPad accessories, Music accessories and other
internal lines of business that reflect revenues, detailed information on costs of goods
sold and detailed information on expenses pursuant to the categories identified and
used by Apple’s financial planning and analysis group and provided to management.
sf-3115377
Diane Hutnyan
March 14, 2012
Page Two
U.S. and worldwide units, revenues and standard costs from 2007 through 2011 for
iPhone, iPod Touch and iPad by model.
U.S. sales of iPhone broken down by carrier and other channels from 2007 to present.
Internal U.S. iTunes Business P&L prepared by the relevant financial team and
provided to Apple’s management.
Costed bills of materials for all accused Apple products, showing manufacturing
expense by line item by quarter as prepared and tracked by Apple’s manufacturing
group.
Royalty reports reflecting royalties paid for the accused products from 2007 to 2011
from Apple’s product marketing group.
Gross margin reports reflecting Apple’s gross margin calculations by financial
quarter for iPhone for use in circumstances where revenue cannot be specifically
allocated to products due to subsidies, commissions and adjustments.
Capital expenditure data regarding retail stores and other capital expenditures from
2007 forward.
Internal pricing documents showing prices paid by various segments of customers.
Report prepared by Apple’s operations group regarding Apple’s inventory, builds,
unit sales, and manufacturing results based both on what Apple built and what more it
could have built given existing part shortages and existing manufacturing lines for
each iPad model and for each iPhone model in 2010 and 2011.
Internal forecasts for iPhone business.
Information on payments Apple receives from third parties for searching and for the
ability to advertise products as being “made for” Apple products.
Report reflecting U.S. advertising spending for iPhone and iPad.
Updated royalty reports
Reports reflecting Apple’s investments in these lines of business, including expenses
for training, stores, and repairs.
sf-3115377
Diane Hutnyan
March 14, 2012
Page Three
This non-exclusive list reflects compliance with Apple’s promises and with the Court’s
Order. This, of course, is in addition to the great volume of information on financial topics
that is available in Apple’s annual and quarterly SEC filings and shareholder proxies.
Collectively, this information provides a more than sufficient basis to evaluate in detail
Apple’s actual performance during the periods relevant to the litigation.
The additional information that may be responsive to the specific requests you identify
would be largely duplicative. Further, your request for budgets from prior periods would
needlessly add to the burden of production without any corresponding benefit given that
actual figures are now available and have been reported.
Sincerely,
/s/ Jason R. Bartlett
Jason R. Bartlett
cc:
Peter Kolovos
S. Calvin Walden
sf-3115377
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?