Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
189
OPPOSITION (re #153 MOTION to Dismiss and MOTION to Strike Apple's Counterclaims ) filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Selwyn, Mark) (Filed on 8/29/2011) Modified text on 9/1/2011 (dhm, COURT STAFF).
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
2
3
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
4
Plaintiff,
5
6
7
8
9
vs.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity, SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation, and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
12
13
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity, SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation, and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
14
15
16
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION
TO DISMISS AND STRIKE
APPLE’S COUNTERCLAIMS
Defendants.
10
11
Civil Action No. 11-CV-01846-LHK
Date: September 22, 2011
Time: 1:30 p.m.
Place: Courtroom 4, 5th Floor
Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh
Counterclaim-Plaintiffs,
v.
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
17
Counterclaim-Defendant.
18
The Court, having considered the papers submitted by the parties, HEREBY ORDERS as
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
follows:
1.
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Counts XXVII, XXVIII, and XXIX of Apple
Inc.’s Counterclaims in Reply is DENIED; and
2.
Defendants’ Motion to Strike Counts XXX, XXXI, and XXXII of Apple Inc.’s
Counterclaims in Reply is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
DATED: ____________, 2011
27
28
Hon. Lucy H. Koh
United States District Court Judge
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?