Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
196
Joint MOTION to Shorten Time Stipulated Motion to Expedite Briefing and Hearing on Samsung's Motion to Compel filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Jenkins Declaration)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 8/31/2011)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a
New York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER GRANTING EXPEDITED
BRIEFING AND HEARING ON
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL
Defendants.
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXPEDITED BRIEFING ON SAMSUNG’S
MOTION TO COMPEL
1
Plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung
2 Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively
3 “Samsung”), by and through their counsel and subject to the Court’s approval, hereby
4 STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:
5
WHEREAS, Apple filed a Motion for a Preliminary Injunction on July 1, 2011
6 (Dkt No. 86);
7
WHEREAS, the Court ordered Apple to provide to Samsung discovery related to
8 Apple’s preliminary injunction motion by August 8, 2011 (Dkt No. 115);
9
WHEREAS, Samsung served various discovery requests on Apple on July 6, 2011;
10
WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred several times regarding various disputes
11 related to Samsung’s discovery requests but were unable to resolve all of the issues;
12
WHEREAS, Samsung is filing and serving its Motion to Compel Apple to Produce
13 Documents and Things in Response to Samsung’s Request for Production No. 1 and Further
14 Responses to Interrogatories Nos. 1, 3, and 6 (“Motion to Compel”) concurrently herewith;
15
WHEREAS, pursuant to the 35-day rule in Civil Local Rule 7-2, Samsung noticed
16 its Motion to Compel for a hearing at the earliest possible hearing date of October 11, 2011;
WHEREAS, the hearing on Apple’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction is
17
18 scheduled for October 13, 2011, just two days after the current hearing date for the Motion to
19 Compel;
20
WHEREAS, the parties respectfully request the Court to allow expedited briefing
21 and hearing on Samsung’s Motion to Compel to provide sufficient time to comply with the
22 Court’s decision regarding the Motion to Compel;
23
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED TO BETWEEN
24 THE PARTIES THAT, subject to the Court’s approval:
25
26
27
28
Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion to Compel will be due on or before
Friday, September 9, 2011
Samsung’s Reply in support of its Motion to Compel will be due on or before
Monday, September 12, 2011 at 8:00 a.m.
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXPEDITED BRIEFING ON SAMSUNG’S
MOTION TO COMPEL
1
2
A hearing on Samsung’s Motion to Compel shall be heard on September 13, 2011
at 10:00 a.m., or the earliest date convenient for the Court.
3
4
5 Dated: August 31, 2011
6
By:
7
8
/s/ Victoria F. Maroulis
Attorneys for Defendants SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
9
10
11
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
Dated: August 31, 2011
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
12
By:
13
/s/ Jason Bartlett
Attorneys for Plaintiff APPLE INC.
14
15
16
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
19 Dated:
20
21
Honorable Paul S. Grewal
Magistrate Judge of the United States District Court
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXPEDITED BRIEFING ON SAMSUNG’S
MOTION TO COMPEL
GENERAL ORDER ATTESTATION
1
2
3
In compliance with General Order 45(X)(B), I hereby attest that Jason Bartlett has
concurred in this filing.
4
5
6
/s/ Victoria F. Maroulis
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXPEDITED BRIEFING ON SAMSUNG’S
MOTION TO COMPEL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?