Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 2000

UNOPPOSED MOTION to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document ( Exhibit 19 to the Pierce Declaration in support of Samsung's Rules 50 and 50 Motion (Dkt. No. 1991) ) filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Corrected Exhibit 19 to the Pierce Declaration)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 9/25/2012) Modified text on 9/26/2012 (dhmS, COURT STAFF).

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
2 [e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
3 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
5 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
[e-mail]
6 Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
[e-mail]
th
7 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5 Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
8 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
9
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
10 [e-mail]
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
11 Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
12 Facsimile: [phone]
13 Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
14 AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION

18 APPLE INC., a California corporation,

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK

Plaintiff,

19

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO REMOVE
INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENT
(DKT. NO, 1991)

vs.

20

21 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
22 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
23 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
24
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4977945.1
1010

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENT (DKT. NO, 1991)

1

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung

2 Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively “Samsung”) hereby move the Court to remove
3 from its docket Exhibit 19 to the Declaration of John Pierce in Support of Samsung’s Rules 50 and
4 59 Motion (Dkt. No. 1991), which consists of an un-redacted version of Plaintiff’s Trial Exhibit
5 81.

Since a redacted version of Plaintiff’s Trial Exhibit 81 that excludes information third-party

6 Intel considers confidential was admitted during trial, Samsung requests that the un-redacted
7 version filed in Dkt. No. 1991 be removed from the Court’s docket and replaced with the partially
8 redacted version admitted during trial.
9

Attached to this Motion is Corrected Exhibit 19 to the Pierce Declaration.

10
11 DATED: September 25, 2012
12
13
14
15
16
17

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
By /s/ Victoria F. Maroulis
Charles K. Verhoeven
Kevin P.B. Johnson
Victoria F. Maroulis
Michael T. Zeller
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC., and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4977945.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-1UNOPPOSED MOTION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENT (DKT. NO, 1991)