Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
205
MOTION to Compel (Redacted) filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. Motion Hearing set for 9/13/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 4th Floor, San Jose before Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal. Responses due by 9/9/2011. Replies due by 9/12/2011. (Attachments: #1 Jenkins Declaration, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N, #16 Exhibit O, #17 Exhibit P, #18 Exhibit Q, #19 Proposed Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 9/1/2011)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL
APPLE TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS
AND THINGS IN RESPONSE TO
SAMSUNG’S REQUEST FOR
PRODUCTION NO. 1 AND FURTHER
RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES
NOS. 1, 3, AND 6
Defendants.
02198.51855/4327657.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL
1
The Court, having considered the briefs and arguments presented to this Court on
2 Samsung’s Motion to Compel, and good cause having been shown, HEREBY ORDERS that:
3
Samsung’s Motion to Compel is GRANTED in its entirety.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8 DATED:
_________________, 2011
9
10
11
Hon. Paul S. Grewal
United States District Court Magistrate Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4327657.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?