Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
211
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Bartlett, Jason) (Filed on 9/9/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
hmcelhinny@mofo.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
mjacobs@mofo.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
rhung@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: (415) 268-7000
Facsimile: (415) 268-7522
7
8
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.
WILLIAM F. LEE
william.lee@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: (617) 526-6000
Facsimile: (617) 526-5000
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 858-6000
Facsimile: (650) 858-6100
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN JOSE DIVISION
14
15
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Case No.
11-cv-01846-LHK
16
Plaintiff,
17
v.
18
19
20
21
22
APPLE’S STIPULATED
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER
SEAL
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company.,
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3042268
1
2
3
In accordance with Civil L.R. 79-5 and 7-11, and General Order No. 62, Apple Inc.
(“Apple”) moves this Court for an order to seal:
1. The confidential, unredacted version of Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion to
4
Compel Regarding Request For Production No. 1 and Interrogatory Nos. 1, 3, and 6
5
(“Opposition”);
6
2. The Declaration of Christopher J. Stringer in Support of Apple Inc.’s Opposition to
7
Samsung’s Motion to Compel Regarding Request for Production No. 1 and Interrogatory Nos. 1,
8
3, and 6 (“Stringer Declaration”);
9
3. The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of Jason Bartlett in Support of
10
Apple Inc.’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Regarding Request for Production No.
11
1 and Interrogatory Nos. 1, 3, and 6 (“Bartlett Declaration”);
12
4. Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, H, I, and J to the Bartlett Declaration; and
13
5. The Declaration of Patrick Zhang in Support of Apple Inc.’s Opposition to Samsung’s
14
Motion to Compel Regarding Request for Production No. 1 and Interrogatory Nos. 1, 3, and 6
15
(“Zhang Declaration”).
16
Apple has established good cause to permit filing this information under seal through the
17
Declaration of Erica Tierney in Support of Apple’s Administrative Motion to File Documents
18
Under Seal (the “Sealing Declaration”), filed herewith.
19
The Opposition and accompanying Stringer, Bartlett and Zhang Declarations contain
20
information relating to Apple’s design trade secrets, confidential business practices and policies
21
for preserving the secrecy and confidentiality of its product development. (Sealing Decl. at ¶ 2.)
22
It is Apple’s policy and practice not to disclose such information because it is confidential to
23
Apple. (Id.) This information is indicative of the way in which Apple manages its business
24
affairs and conducts product development, and thus can be used by Apple’s competitors to its
25
disadvantage. (Id.)
26
27
In conclusion, Apple requests that the Court order that the confidential, unredacted
version of Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Regarding Request For
28
APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3042268
1
1
Production No. 1 and Interrogatory Nos. 1, 3, and 6 and the accompanying declarations and
2
exhibits be filed under seal.
3
Pursuant to General Order No. 62, the complete, unredacted versions of Apple’s
4
Opposition, Supporting Declarations, and all Exhibits to the Supporting Declarations will be
5
lodged with the Court for in camera review and served on all parties.
6
Samsung does not oppose this motion.
7
8
Dated: September 9, 2011
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
9
By: /s/ Michael A. Jacobs
MICHAEL A. JACOBS
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE
I, JASON R. BARTLETT, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to
file this Declaration. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Michael A.
Jacobs has concurred in this filing.
Dated: September 9, 2011
By:
/s/ Jason R. Bartlett
Jason R. Bartlett
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3042268
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?