Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 213

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Reply in Support of its Motion to Compel filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Arnold Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 9/12/2011)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
 [e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
 Facsimile: [phone]
 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
[e-mail]
 Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
[e-mail]
 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
 [e-mail]
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
 Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
 Facsimile: [phone]
 Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
 AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION

 APPLE INC., a California corporation,

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK



SAMSUNG’S STIPULATED
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL ITS REPLY BRIEF IN
SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO
COMPEL



Plaintiff,
vs.

 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,

Defendants.






02198.51855/4344671.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE ITS REPLY BRIEF UNDER SEAL________

1

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5, and General Order No. 62, Defendants Samsung

2 Electronics Co. Ltd. (“SEC”), Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“SEA”) and Samsung
3 Telecommunications America, LLC (“STA”) (collectively, “Samsung”) hereby bring this
4 administrative motion for an order to seal:
5

1. The confidential, unredacted version of Samsung’s Reply in Support of its Motion

6

to Compel Apple to Produce Documents And Things In Response to Samsung’s

7

Request for Production No. 1 and Further Responses to Interrogatories Nos. 1, 3,

8

and 6 (the “Reply”).

9

Samsung has established good cause to permit filing this document under seal through the

10 Arnold Declaration in support of this motion to file under seal, filed herewith.

In particular, the

11 Reply contains information relating to Apple’s design trade practices and policies.

(Arnold Decl.

12 ¶ 2.)

Apple has represented to Samsung that such information is highly confidential to Apple.

13 (Id.)

The Reply also contains references to attorney communications and interrogatory responses

14 that Apple has designated as highly confidential.
15

(Arnold Decl. ¶ 3-4.)

Samsung expects that, pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(d), Apple will file within seven days an

16 appropriate declaration with the Court establishing that the documents and information it has
17 designated as highly confidential are sealable.
18

Pursuant to General Order No. 62, the complete, unredacted versions of Samsung’s Reply

19 will be lodged with the Court for in camera review and served on all parties.
20

Apple does not oppose this motion.

(Arnold Decl. ¶ 5.)

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4344671.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE ITS REPLY BRIEF UNDER SEAL________

-1-

1
2 DATED: September 12, 2011
3

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

4
5
6
7
8
9

By

/s/ Victoria F. Maroulis
Charles K. Verhoeven
Kevin P.B. Johnson
Victoria F. Maroulis
Michael T. Zeller
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC., and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4344671.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE ITS REPLY BRIEF UNDER SEAL________

-2-