Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 2139

Declaration of Albert P. Bedecarre in Support of 2138 Order on Motion for Leave to File, 2053 Opposition/Response to Motion, 2054 Brief, filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Manual Filing Notification for Exhibits 1 and 2 to Declaration of Albert P. Bedecarre)(Related document(s) 2138 , 2053 , 2054 ) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 11/14/2012)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 2 1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151)  charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor  San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600  Facsimile: (415) 875-6700  Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129) kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com  Victoria F. Maroulis (Bar No. 202603) victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com th  555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5 Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139  Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100  Michael T. Zeller (Bar No. 196417)  michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor  Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000  Facsimile: (213) 443-3100  Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,  INC. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION   APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK   Plaintiff, vs.  SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG  ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG  TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,  Defendant.  MANUAL FILING NOTIFICATION FOR EXHIBITS 1 AND 2 TO DECLARATION OF ALBERT P. BEDECARRÉ IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S OPPOSITION TO APPLE’S MOTION FOR A PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DAMAGES ENHANCEMENT AND SAMSUNG'S OPPOSITION TO APPLE'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW, NEW TRIAL AND AMENDED JUDGMENT   02198.51855/5049330.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK MANUAL FILING NOTIFICATION 1 MANUAL FILING NOTIFICATION 2 Regarding: Exhibits 1 and 2 to the Declaration of Albert P. Bedecarré in Support of Samsung’s 3 Opposition to Apple’s Motion for a Permanent Injunction and Damages 4 Enhancement and Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion for Judgment as a 5 Matter of Law, New Trial and Amended Judgment 6 This filing is in paper or physical form only, and is being maintained in the case file in the Clerk’s 7 office. Samsung served identical copies of the manually filed devices on all parties on November 8 13, 2012. For information on retrieving this filing directly from the court, please see the court’s 9 main web site at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov under Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ). 10 11 This filing was not e-filed for the following reason(s): 12 __ Voluminous Document (PDF file size larger than efiling system allowances) 13 Unable to Scan Documents 14 Physical Object (description): Production model of grey version of Galaxy S II (T- 15 Mobile) (Model No. SGH-T989) (Exhibit 1); Production model of grey version of 16 X Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch (Model No. SPH-D710) (Exhibit 2) 17 __ Non Graphical/Textual Computer File (audio, video, etc.) on CD or other media 18 Item Under Seal 19 Conformance with the Judicial Conference Privacy Policy (General Order 53) 20 Other (description): 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/5049330.1 -2- Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK MANUAL FILING NOTIFICATION 1 DATED: November 13, 2012 Respectfully submitted, 2 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 3 4 5 6 7 8 By Victoria F. Maroulis Victoria F. Maroulis Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/5049330.1 -3- Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK MANUAL FILING NOTIFICATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?