Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 2142

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 2141 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Motion to Compel Depositions of Apple Reply Expert Declarants and Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of HTC Settlement Agreement filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Victoria F. Maroulis, # 2 Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Victoria F. Maroulis)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 11/16/2012)

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151)  charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor  San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600  Facsimile: (415) 875-6700  Kathleen M. Sullivan (Bar No. 242261) kathleensullivan@quinnemanuel.com  Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129 kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com  Victoria F. Maroulis (Bar No. 202603) victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com th  555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5 Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 (650) 801-5000  Telephone: Facsimile: (650) 801-5100  Susan R. Estrich (Bar No. 124009)  susanestrich@quinnemanuel.com Michael T. Zeller (Bar No. 196417)  michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor  Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000  Facsimile: (213) 443-3100  Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,  INC. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION  APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)  DECLARATION OF VICTORIA F. MAROULIS IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITIONS OF APPLE REPLY EXPERT DECLARANTS  Plaintiff, vs.  SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG  ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG  TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,  Defendants.    02198.51855/5056361.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) MAROULIS DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION RE: SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL 1 I, Victoria F. Maroulis, declare as follows:  1. I am a partner in the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP,  counsel for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung  Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”). I have personal knowledge of the  facts set forth in this declaration and, if called upon as a witness, I could and would testify to such  facts under oath.  2. On November 14 and 16, 2012, my colleague Robert Becher contacted counsel for  Apple via email and proposed a shortened briefing schedule regarding Samsung’s Motions to  Compel. After negotiations, the parties agreed that Samsung will file its Motions to Compel by  noon on November 16, 2012, Apple will file its opposition by November 20, 2012, Samsung  waives its right to a reply brief, and the parties waive oral argument. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1  is a true and correct copy of the email exchange with counsel for Apple.  3. The relief requested in the Stipulation is necessary in order to allow the Court to  decide Samsung’s Motion to Compel sufficiently in advance of the December 6, 2012 hearing on  Apple’s Motion for a Permanent Injunction and for Damages Enhancements and Apple’s Motion  for Judgment as a Matter of Law, New Trial and Amended Judgment so that there is time for  Samsung to take the requested depositions and submit the requested additional briefing. If the  time for briefing were not shortened, the Motion would not be decided until after the December 6,  2012 hearing.  4. The Court has granted several motions filed by both parties to shorten time. As a  recent example, Samsung filed a motion to shorten time for briefing on its Motion for Order  Permitting Cross-Use of Discovery Material from Case No. 12-cv-00630-LHK. (Dkt. No. 2071).  The Court required Apple to file a response to Samsung’s motion on a shortened schedule. (Dkt.  No. 2078).  5. The requested time modification will not affect the schedule of the case.     02198.51855/5056361.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) -1MAROULIS DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION RE: SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL 1 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is 2 true and correct. Executed on the 16th day of November, 2012, at Los Angeles, California. 3 4 5 /s/ Victoria F. Maroulis Victoria F. Maroulis 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/5056361.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) -2MAROULIS DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION RE: SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?