Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
251
STIPULATION and Proposed Order Extending Deadline for Apple's Discovery of Samsung by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Bartlett, Jason) (Filed on 9/21/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
hmcelhinny@mofo.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
mjacobs@mofo.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
rhung@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: (415) 268-7000
Facsimile: (415) 268-7522
7
8
9
10
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 858-6000
Facsimile: (650) 858-6100
WILLIAM F. LEE (pro hac vice)
william.lee@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: (617) 526-6000
Facsimile: (617) 526-5000
Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
SAN JOSE DIVISION
15
16
17
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
21
22
23
v.
Case No.
4:11-cv-01846-LHK
BARTLETT DECLARATION IN
SUPPORT OF STIPULATION
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR
APPLE’S DISCOVERY OF
SAMSUNG
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Date:
AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
Time:
company,
Place:
Judge:
Defendants.
TBD
TBD
Courtroom 8, 4th Floor
Hon. Lucy H. Koh
24
25
26
27
28
BARTLETT DECL. ISO JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DEADLINE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3047626
1
1
2
I, Jason Bartlett, declare as follows:
1. I am a partner in the law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP, counsel for Apple Inc.
3
(“Apple”) in its suit against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
4
and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”). I have personal
5
knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration and, if called upon as a witness, I could and
6
would testify to such facts under oath.
7
8
9
2. I submit this declaration in support of the parties’ stipulation and proposed order
extending the deadline for Apple’s discovery from Samsung, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2.
3. On July 1, 2011, Apple filed a motion for preliminary injunction, seeking in part
10
an order that Apple is entitled to a preliminary injunction based on Samsung’s alleged
11
infringement of three Apple design patents and one Apple utility patent. (See D.N. 86.)
12
4. On July 2, 2011, the Court invited the parties to provide input regarding a
13
reasonable time frame for briefing and hearing Apple’s motion, noting that the schedule would
14
need to accommodate time to conduct discovery pertinent to the preliminary injunction motion.
15
(See D.N. 95.)
16
17
18
5. On July 8, 2011, the parties filed a joint submission regarding the briefing and
hearing schedule. (See D.N. 100.)
6. On July 18, 2011, this Court entered an Order Setting Briefing and Hearing
19
Schedule for Preliminary Injunction Motion (see D.N. 115), setting September 21, 2011 as the
20
deadline for Apple’s discovery from Samsung relating to the preliminary injunction motion.
21
7. Since Samsung filed its opposition to Apple’s preliminary injunction motion, the
22
parties have worked to schedule the depositions of witnesses with information pertaining to that
23
opposition. Those witnesses include Roger Fidler and Jeffrey Johnson, who provided
24
declarations in support of that opposition.
25
8. Despite the parties’ best efforts to schedule the depositions within the deadline set
26
by the Court’s July 18, 2011 Order, the depositions of Messrs. Fidler and Johnson could not be
27
scheduled to take place until September 23 and September 26, respectively.
28
BARTLETT DECL. ISO JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DEADLINE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3047626
2
1
9. The parties previously modified the Court’s July 18, 2011 Order to give Samsung
2
a one week extension of its discovery deadline, so it could depose two additional Apple
3
witnesses.
4
5
6
7
10. No other deadlines or hearing dates are affected by this stipulation and [proposed]
order.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on
September 21, 2011 in San Francisco, California.
8
9
10
/s/ Jason Bartlett
JASON BARTLETT
.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BARTLETT DECL. ISO JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DEADLINE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3047626
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?