Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 251

STIPULATION and Proposed Order Extending Deadline for Apple's Discovery of Samsung by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Bartlett, Jason) (Filed on 9/21/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781) hmcelhinny@mofo.com MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) rhung@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 7 8 9 10 MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180) mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 WILLIAM F. LEE (pro hac vice) william.lee@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 Attorneys for Plaintiff APPLE INC. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 SAN JOSE DIVISION 15 16 17 APPLE INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, 18 19 20 21 22 23 v. Case No. 4:11-cv-01846-LHK BARTLETT DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR APPLE’S DISCOVERY OF SAMSUNG SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS Date: AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability Time: company, Place: Judge: Defendants. TBD TBD Courtroom 8, 4th Floor Hon. Lucy H. Koh 24 25 26 27 28 BARTLETT DECL. ISO JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DEADLINE CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK sf-3047626 1 1 2 I, Jason Bartlett, declare as follows: 1. I am a partner in the law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP, counsel for Apple Inc. 3 (“Apple”) in its suit against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. 4 and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”). I have personal 5 knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration and, if called upon as a witness, I could and 6 would testify to such facts under oath. 7 8 9 2. I submit this declaration in support of the parties’ stipulation and proposed order extending the deadline for Apple’s discovery from Samsung, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2. 3. On July 1, 2011, Apple filed a motion for preliminary injunction, seeking in part 10 an order that Apple is entitled to a preliminary injunction based on Samsung’s alleged 11 infringement of three Apple design patents and one Apple utility patent. (See D.N. 86.) 12 4. On July 2, 2011, the Court invited the parties to provide input regarding a 13 reasonable time frame for briefing and hearing Apple’s motion, noting that the schedule would 14 need to accommodate time to conduct discovery pertinent to the preliminary injunction motion. 15 (See D.N. 95.) 16 17 18 5. On July 8, 2011, the parties filed a joint submission regarding the briefing and hearing schedule. (See D.N. 100.) 6. On July 18, 2011, this Court entered an Order Setting Briefing and Hearing 19 Schedule for Preliminary Injunction Motion (see D.N. 115), setting September 21, 2011 as the 20 deadline for Apple’s discovery from Samsung relating to the preliminary injunction motion. 21 7. Since Samsung filed its opposition to Apple’s preliminary injunction motion, the 22 parties have worked to schedule the depositions of witnesses with information pertaining to that 23 opposition. Those witnesses include Roger Fidler and Jeffrey Johnson, who provided 24 declarations in support of that opposition. 25 8. Despite the parties’ best efforts to schedule the depositions within the deadline set 26 by the Court’s July 18, 2011 Order, the depositions of Messrs. Fidler and Johnson could not be 27 scheduled to take place until September 23 and September 26, respectively. 28 BARTLETT DECL. ISO JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DEADLINE CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK sf-3047626 2 1 9. The parties previously modified the Court’s July 18, 2011 Order to give Samsung 2 a one week extension of its discovery deadline, so it could depose two additional Apple 3 witnesses. 4 5 6 7 10. No other deadlines or hearing dates are affected by this stipulation and [proposed] order. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on September 21, 2011 in San Francisco, California. 8 9 10 /s/ Jason Bartlett JASON BARTLETT . 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BARTLETT DECL. ISO JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DEADLINE CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK sf-3047626 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?