Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 256

MOTION for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief filed by Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Morton, Melinda) (Filed on 9/23/2011)

Download PDF
1 DANIEL J. BERGESON, Bar No. 105439 dbergeson@be-law.com  MELINDA M. MORTON, Bar No. 209373 mmorton@be-law.com  BERGESON, LLP 303 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 500  San Jose, CA 95110-272 Telephone: (408) 291-6200  Facsimile: (408) 297-6000  Of Counsel: MICHAEL E. JOFFRE  AARON M. PANNER KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS &  FIGEL, PLLC 1615 M Street N.W., #400  Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 326-7900  Facsimile: (202) 326-7999  Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION  APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK  [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE CELLCO PARTNERSHIP REGARDING APPLE’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION  Plaintiff, vs.  SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG  ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG  TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,  Defendants.  Date: October 13, 2011 Time: 1:30 pm Courtroom 8, 4th Floor Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh       [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK 1 Good cause appearing, the motion of Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless for leave 2 to file a brief of amicus curiae is hereby GRANTED. 3 4 5 __________________, 2011 6 Hon. Lucy H. Koh UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?