Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 282

STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to File Under Seal Apple's Reply in Support of Its Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Related Documents filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 9/30/2011) Modified text on 10/4/2011 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781) hmcelhinny@mofo.com MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) rhung@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 7 8 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC. WILLIAM F. LEE william.lee@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180) mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN JOSE DIVISION 14 15 APPLE INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, 16 17 18 19 20 v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company., Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL ITS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK sf-3051330 1 By administrative motion, Plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) has moved to file under seal 2 portions of its Reply in Support of its Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and certain supporting 3 documents. In support of its motion, Apple has filed the declaration required under Civil L.R. 4 Rule 79-5 and General Order No. 62, which provides evidence of good cause for this Court to 5 permit filing under seal. The declaration establishes that information contained in the documents 6 listed below is “privileged or protectable as a trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under 7 the law.” Civil L.R. 79-5(a). Apple’s request is narrowly tailored to seek the sealing only of 8 sealable information. 9 10 11 12 Samsung does not oppose this administrative motion. Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS that the following documents shall be filed under seal: 1. 13 14 a Preliminary Injunction (“Reply”); 2. 15 16 The confidential, unredacted version of Apple’s Reply in Support of its Motion for The confidential, unredacted version of the Reply Declaration of Tony Blevins in Support of Apple’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (“Blevins Declaration”); 3. 17 The Reply Declaration of Richard J. Lutton, Jr. in Support of Apple’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (“Lutton Reply Declaration”); 18 4. Exhibits A, B, and C to the Lutton Reply Declaration; 19 5. The Reply Declaration of Terry Musika in Support of Apple’s Motion for a 20 Preliminary Injunction (“Musika Declaration”); 21 6. Exhibits 1, 2, 3, and 4 to the Musika Declaration; 22 7. The Reply Declaration of Arthur Rangel in Support of Apple’s Motion for a 23 Preliminary Injunction (“Rangel Declaration”); 24 8. Exhibits A, B, and C to the Rangel Declaration; 25 9. The confidential, unredacted version of the Reply Declaration of Sanjay Sood in 26 27 Support of Apple’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (“Sood Declaration”); 10. Exhibits D and H to the Sood Declaration; 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK sf-3051330 1 1 11. 2 The Reply Declaration of Christopher Stringer in Support of Apple’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (“Stringer Declaration”); 3 12. Exhibits 1-9 to the Stringer Declaration; 4 13. The confidential, unredacted version of the Reply Declaration of Cooper C. 5 Woodring in Support of Apple’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (“Woodring 6 Reply Declaration”); 7 14. Exhibit 1 to the Woodring Reply Declaration; and 8 15. Exhibits A, B, C, D, M, P, S, W, Z, EE, FF, GG, JJ, KK and LL to the Declaration 9 of Francis Ho in Support of Apple’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. 10 11 12 The Court further ORDERS that redacted versions of the following documents shall be filed on ECF: 13 1. Apple’s Reply in Support of its Motion for a Preliminary Injunction; 14 2. the Blevins Declaration; 15 3. the Sood Declaration; and 16 4. the Woodring Reply Declaration. 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 Dated: ___________________, 2011 By: HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK sf-3051330 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?