Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
309
Declaration of Jennifer Lee Taylor n Support of Apple's Objections to Samsung's Untimely Evidence, filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 10/17/2011) Modified on 10/18/2011. Cannot link entry. Objections have not been efiled (dhm, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
hmcelhinny@mofo.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
mjacobs@mofo.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
rhung@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: 415.268.7000
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
7
8
9
WILLIAM F. LEE
william.lee@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: (617) 526-6000
Facsimile: (617) 526-5000
MARK D. SELWYN (CA SBN 244180)
mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE
AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN JOSE DIVISION
14
15
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Plaintiff,
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
DECL. OF JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR ISO APPLE’S OBJECTIONS
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
sf-3059419
Case No.
11-cv-01846-LHK
DECLARATION OF JENNIFER
LEE TAYLOR IN SUPPORT OF
APPLE’S OBJECTIONS TO
SAMSUNG’S UNTIMELY NEW
EVIDENCE
1
I, Jennifer Lee Taylor, declare as follows:
2
1.
I am an attorney at the law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP, counsel of record in
3
this action for plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”). I submit this declaration in support of Apple’s
4
Objections to Samsung’s Untimely New Evidence. Unless otherwise indicated, I have personal
5
knowledge of the matters set forth below. If called as a witness I could and would testify
6
competently as follows.
7
1.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of a photograph that I took
8
of a blank sheet of white Plexiglas that was later marked as Ex. 267 at the deposition of Roger
9
Fidler. The Plexiglas sheet was adjacent to a piece of paper when I took the photograph.
10
2.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of a photograph that I took
11
of a stack of blank white Plexiglas sheets, one of which was later marked as Ex. 267 at the
12
deposition of Roger Fidler.
13
3.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of a photograph that I took
14
of a Plexiglas digital newspaper mock-up that was marked as Ex. 268 at the deposition of Roger
15
Fidler. We have added markings to indicate the edge of the newssheet encased in the Plexiglas,
16
the location of the raised frame, and the edge of the raised frame.
17
4.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of a photograph that I took
18
of a Plexiglas digital newspaper mock-up that was marked as Ex. 269 at the deposition of Roger
19
Fidler. We have added markings to indicate the edge of the newssheet encased in the Plexiglas,
20
the location of the raised frame, and the edge of the raised frame.
21
5.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of a photograph that I took
22
of the outside edge and corner of a Plexiglas digital newspaper mock-up that was marked as
23
Ex. 269 at the deposition of Roger Fidler. The Plexiglas digital newspaper mock-up was adjacent
24
to a laptop computer when I took the photograph.
25
6.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of a photograph that I took
26
of part of the front surface and a corner of the Plexiglas digital newspaper mock-up that was
27
marked as Ex. 269 at the deposition of Roger Fidler. We have added markings to indicate the
28
location and edge of the raised frame.
DECL. OF JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR ISO APPLE’S OBJECTIONS
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
sf-3059419
1
1
7.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of a photograph that I took
2
of the back of the Plexiglas digital newspaper mock-up that was marked as Ex. 268 at the
3
deposition of Roger Fidler. We have added markings to indicate the edge of the newssheet
4
encased in the Plexiglas.
5
8.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of a photograph that I took
6
of the back of the Plexiglas digital newspaper mock-up that was marked as Ex. 268 at the
7
deposition of Roger Fidler.
8
9.
I took each of the above-described photographs on September 23, 2011, at the
9
deposition of Roger Fidler. Apple is submitting these photographs on a contingent basis in the
10
event that the Court decides to consider Samsung’s photographs of Exhibits 267-269 from the
11
deposition of Roger Fidler.
12
13
I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this
Declaration was executed this 17th day of October, 2011, at San Francisco, California.
14
15
By:
16
/s/ Jennifer Lee Taylor
Jennifer Lee Taylor
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DECL. OF JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR ISO APPLE’S OBJECTIONS
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
sf-3059419
2
1
2
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE
I, MICHAEL A. JACOBS, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to
3
file this Declaration. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Jennifer Lee
4
Taylor has concurred in this filing.
5
Dated: October 17, 2011
By:
6
/s/ Michael A. Jacobs
Michael A. Jacobs
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DECL. OF JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR ISO APPLE’S OBJECTIONS
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
sf-3059419
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?