Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 464

MOTION to Shorten Timefor Briefing and Hearing on Apple's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Things, filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 12/8/2011) Modified text on 12/9/2011 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 APPLE INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 18 19 v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON APPLE’S MOTION TO COMPEL Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG) sf- 3080834 1 2 Plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) has moved pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-3 for an order shortening the briefing and hearing schedule for Apple’s Motion to Compel. 3 Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, and good cause 4 having been shown, the Court hereby grants Apple’s Motion to Shorten Time for Briefing and 5 Hearing on Apple’s Motion to Compel, and sets the hearing on Apple’s Motion to Compel for 6 December 16, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. Defendants may file and serve their opposition papers no later 7 than December 12, 2011. Apple may file and serve a reply brief no later than December 14, 8 2011. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December _____, 2011. 11 12 13 HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL United States District Court Magistrate Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG) sf- 3080834 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?