Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 531

MOTION to Shorten Time for Briefing and Hearing on Apple's Motion to Strike filed by Apple Inc.(a California corporation). (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mark D. Selwyn in Support of Motion to Shorten Time, #2 Proposed Order)(Selwyn, Mark) (Filed on 12/22/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
[e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9

WILLIAM F. LEE (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant Apple Inc.

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

12
13

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
14
15
16
17
18
19

Plaintiff,
vs.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity, SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation, and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24

Civil Action No. 11-CV-01846-LHK

APPLE INC.’S MOTION TO SHORTEN
TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING
ON APPLE’S MOTION TO STRIKE
Hearing:
Time:

TBD
TBD

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity, SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation, and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Counterclaim-Plaintiffs,

25
v.
26
27

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Counterclaim-Defendant.

28
APPLE INC.’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON APPLE’S
MOTION TO STRIKE
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

1

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION

2

TO DEFENDANTS SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS

3

AMERICA, INC., AND SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC AND

4

THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

5

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Apple Inc. (“Apple”) hereby moves for an order,

6

pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-3, to shorten time for briefing and hearing on its

7

accompanying Motion to Strike Evidence Not Disclosed as Required by Patent Local Rule 4-

8

3(b).

9

This motion is based on this Notice of Motion, the accompanying Memorandum of Points

10

and Authorities in support thereof, the supporting Declaration of Mark D. Selwyn, and any other

11

matters properly before the Court.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-

APPLE INC.’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON APPLE’S
MOTION TO STRIKE
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

In accordance with Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-3, Apple moves to shorten the briefing
and hearing schedule for its Motion to Strike. Specifically, Apple requests that:
1)

Samsung’s opposition to the Motion to Strike be filed by January 12, 2012;

2)

The hearing take place at or before the claim construction hearing scheduled for

January 20, 2012.
The shortened briefing and hearing schedule is necessary because Apple is seeking to
strike evidence submitted by Samsung in support of its proposed claim constructions that it did
not disclose in the parties’ Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement as required by
Patent Local Rule 4-3(b) and the Court’s Case Management Order. The claim construction
hearing is scheduled for January 20, 2012. Under an ordinary 35-day briefing and hearing
schedule, Apple’s Motion to Strike could not be heard until January 26, 2012, six days after the
claim construction hearing date. Since Apple seeks to strike evidence that might otherwise be
considered at the claim construction hearing, it is necessary for this motion to be heard on or
before January 20, 2012.
Apple’s proposed schedule allows this Court to consider how to address the evidence
which Apple seeks to strike at the same time as the claim construction hearing. Samsung has not
proposed an alternate schedule, and has not responded to Apple’s request to stipulate to a
shortened briefing and hearing schedule. (Declaration of Mark Selwyn in Support of Apple’s
Motion to Shorten Time ¶ 3.)

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

APPLE INC.’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON APPLE’S
MOTION TO STRIKE
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

1

Dated: December 22, 2011

/s/ Mark. D Selwyn
Mark D. Selwyn (SBN 244180)
([e-mail])
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

2
3
4
5
6

William F. Lee (admitted pro hac vice)
([e-mail])
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9
10

Harold J. McElhinny (SBN 66781)
([e-mail])
Michael A. Jacobs (SBN 111664)
([e-mail])
Richard S.J. Hung (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: ( 415) 268-7000
Facsimile: [phone]

11
12
13
14
15
16

Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant Apple Inc.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-

APPLE INC.’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON APPLE’S
MOTION TO STRIKE
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

1
2
3
4
5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has
been served on December 22, 2011 to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to
electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Civil Local Rule 5.4. Any other counsel
of record will be served by electronic mail, facsimile and/or overnight delivery.

6
7

/s/ Mark. D Selwyn
Mark D. Selwyn

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-

APPLE INC.’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON APPLE’S
MOTION TO STRIKE
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)