Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 547

MOTION for Reconsideration re 515 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Derrick Robinson, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit V (redacted version), # 3 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 12/23/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a 15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New 16 York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, 17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 18 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Defendants. 19 20 On December 20, 2011, the Court granted in part and denied in part an 21 Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics 22 Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC 23 (collectively, “Samsung”). Samsung has now filed a Motion for Leave to File Samsung’s 24 Motion for Reconsideration (“Motion”), pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-9. 25 Having considered the arguments and the papers submitted, the Court hereby 26 ORDERS that Samsung’s Motion is GRANTED. 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 DATED: December ___, 2011 4 5 6 The Honorable Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?