Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 56

MOTION to Compel Apple to Produce Reciprocal Expedited Discovery filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. Motion Hearing set for 9/1/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Lucy H. Koh. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Samsung's Motion to Compel Apple to Produce Reciprocal Expedited Discovery)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 5/27/2011)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
2 [e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
3 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
5 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
[e-mail]
6 Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
[e-mail]
th
7 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5 Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
8 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
9
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
10 [e-mail]
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
11 Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
12 Facsimile: [phone]
13 Attorneys for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
14 Telecommunications America, LLC
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION

17
18

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,

19
20

vs.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
21 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
22 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
23 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
24

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL
APPLE TO PRODUCE RECIPROCAL
EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

Defendants.

25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4162249.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL
APPLE TO PRODUCE RECIPROCAL EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Before the Court is Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc.,

3 and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC’s (collectively “Samsung”) Motion to Compel
4 Apple to Produce Reciprocal Expedited Discovery (the “Motion”).
5

Having considered Samsung’s Motion, the declarations cited therein, and all pleadings and

6 other papers in support thereof; and the Opposition filed by Apple Inc. (“Apple”), all declarations
7 cited therein, and all pleadings and other papers in support thereof; and any further argument or
8 evidence presented by the parties; the Court concludes that good cause exists for Samsung’s
9 Motion. The Court therefore ORDERS that Apple shall produce the following by June 17, 2011:
10

(1) The latest iteration of a product sample of the next generation iPhone that Apple will

11

release, whether that product will be known as the “iPhone 4S,” “iPhone 5,” or some other

12

name;

13

(2) The latest iteration of a product sample of the next generation iPad that Apple will

14

release, whether that product will be known as the “iPad 3,” “Third Generation iPad,” or

15

some other name;

16

(3) The latest iteration of the packaging in which the next generation iPhone and iPad will

17

be sold; and

18

(4) The latest iteration of the package insert(s) for the next generation iPhone and iPad.

19

This discovery shall be produced with the designation “Outside Counsel Eyes Only” and

20 shall not be provided to Samsung or its in-house counsel.
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22 DATED: _________, 2011
23

LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4162249.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL
APPLE TO PRODUCE RECIPROCAL EXPEDITED DISCOVERY