Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 565

OPPOSITION to ( 554 MOTION for Extension of Time For Compliance With Certain Deadlines Set By The Court's Order (Dkt No. 537) ) filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 12/30/2011) Modified text on 1/4/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 APPLE INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 18 19 v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR COMPLIANCE WITH CERTAIN DEADLINES SET BY THE COURT’S DECEMBER 22, 2011 ORDER Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG) sf-3089004 1 2 Defendant Samsung has moved pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-3 for an order extending its deadline to comply with the Court’s December 22, 2011 Order. 3 Having considered the papers submitted, Samsung’s Motion to Extend Time is DENIED. 4 Samsung is hereby ORDERED to disclose to Apple by 12:00 pm on January 2, 2012, the 5 following information relating to Samsung’s compliance with the December 22, 2011 Order: 6 Each individual from whose files documents were or will be searched. To the 7 extent documents were produced from a non-individual, or central, source, that 8 source should be identified. 9 Any search terms that were or will be used in its collection or production efforts. 10 Any date parameters for such searches. 11 Any other categorical limitations on the scope of collection or production. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 Dated: December _____, 2011. 14 15 16 HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG) sf-3089004 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?