Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
600
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Apples Motion to Compel Discovery Relating to Its Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims filed by Apple Inc.(a California corporation). (Attachments: *** #1 Motion to Compel, #2 Maselli Declaration PURSUANT TO ORDER #804 DOCUMENT REMOVED.*** , #3 Ex A, #4 Ex B, #5 Ex C, #6 Ex D, #7 Ex E, #8 Ex F, #9 Ex G, #10 Ex H, #11 Ex I, #12 Ex J, #13 Ex K, #14 Ex L, #15 Ex M, #16 Ex N, #17 Ex O, #18 Ex P, #19 Ex Q, #20 Ex R, #21 Ex S, #22 Ex T, #23 Ex U, #24 Ex V, #25 Ex W, #26 Ex X, #27 Ex Y, #28 Ex Z, #29 Ex AA, #30 Ex BB, #31 Ex CC, #32 Ex DD, #33 Ex EE*** PURSUANT TO ORDER #804 DOCUMENT REMOVED. *** #34 , Ex FF #(35) Ex GG, #36 Proposed Order)(Selwyn, Mark) (Filed on 1/10/2012) Modified on 1/11/2012 (ewn, COURT STAFF). Modified on 1/11/2012 (feriab, COURT STAFF). Modified on 1/11/2012 (ewn, COURT STAFF). (Attachment 1 replaced on 3/13/2012) (sp, COURT STAFF). (Attachment 2 replaced on 3/13/2012) (sp, COURT STAFF). (Attachment 33 replaced on 3/13/2012) (sp, COURT STAFF). Modified on 3/13/2012 (sp, COURT STAFF). Modified on 3/13/2012 (sp, COURT STAFF). Modified on 6/8/2012 (ofr, COURT STAFF).
EXHIBIT GG
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Agada, Enumale
Markman, Rachel;
FW: Apple v. Samsung: - Follow-Up on Issue of Patent License Negotiations
Tuesday, January 10, 2012 12:43:06 PM
From: Herriot, Liv
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 5:35 PM
To: Agada, Enumale
Cc: Liao, Andrew
Subject: FW: Apple v. Samsung: - Follow-Up on Issue of Patent License Negotiations
exhibit FF
From: Walden, S. Calvin
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 9:06 PM
To: WH Apple Samsung NDCal Discovery Team
Subject: FW: Apple v. Samsung: - Follow-Up on Issue of Patent License Negotiations
E-mail to Quinn following up on issue of patent license negotiations.
From: Walden, S. Calvin
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 12:04 AM
To: 'Mazza, Mia'; Charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com; 'dianehutnyan@quinnemanuel.com';
'rachelkassabian@quinnemanuel.com'
Cc: AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple; Maselli, Samuel; Kolovos, Peter
Subject: Apple v. Samsung: - Follow-Up on Issue of Patent License Negotiations
Charlie, Rachel, and Diane,
During Thursday's meeting, you asked whether Apple would be willing to narrow the scope of its requests
for documents reflecting patent license negotiations by identifying particular technological areas or
product lines. After conferring with our team, while we do not believe it is feasible to narrow our
requests on a product line basis, we can further narrow the requests based on technological area:
documents reflecting the negotiation of any license that includes any patent(s) that has been declared
essential to ETSI and/or 3GPP. Please let us know by tomorrow morning whether Samsung agrees to
make a complete production of negotiation documents in this category by January 23, 2012. In the event
Samsung believes that the number of patent licenses falling into this category would make the production
of documents reflecting their negotiation unduly burdensome, please provide a list of such licenses no
later than tomorrow morning, and we will advise whether Apple would accept production of negotiation
documents for only a subset of those licenses.
Thanks,
Calvin
From: Mazza, Mia [mailto:MMazza@mofo.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 7:56 PM
To: Charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
Cc: AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple; Maselli, Samuel; Walden, S. Calvin; Kolovos, Peter
Subject: Apple v. Samsung: Discovery Correspondence - Response to Samsung's Thursday Requests
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?