Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 600

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Apples Motion to Compel Discovery Relating to Its Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims filed by Apple Inc.(a California corporation). (Attachments: *** # 1 Motion to Compel, # 2 Maselli Declaration FILED IN ERROR. DOCUMENT LOCKED. REFER TO DOCUMENT 611 .*** , # 3 Ex A, # 4 Ex B, # 5 Ex C, # 6 Ex D, # 7 Ex E, # 8 Ex F, # 9 Ex G, # 10 Ex H, # 11 Ex I, # 12 Ex J, # 13 Ex K, # 14 Ex L, # 15 Ex M, # 16 Ex N, # 17 Ex O, # 18 Ex P, # 19 Ex Q, # 20 Ex R, # 21 Ex S, # 22 Ex T, # 23 Ex U, # 24 Ex V, # 25 Ex W, # 26 Ex X, # 27 Ex Y, # 28 Ex Z, # 29 Ex AA, # 30 Ex BB, # 31 Ex CC, # 32 Ex DD, # 33 Ex EE*** FILED IN ERROR. DOCUMENT LOCKED. PLEASE REFER TO DOCUMENT 611 . *** # 34 , Ex FF #(35) Ex GG, # 36 Proposed Order)(Selwyn, Mark) (Filed on 1/10/2012) Modified on 1/11/2012 (ewn, COURT STAFF). Modified on 1/11/2012 (feriab, COURT STAFF). Modified on 1/11/2012 (ewn, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
EXHIBIT GG From: To: Subject: Date: Agada, Enumale Markman, Rachel; FW: Apple v. Samsung: - Follow-Up on Issue of Patent License Negotiations Tuesday, January 10, 2012 12:43:06 PM From: Herriot, Liv Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 5:35 PM To: Agada, Enumale Cc: Liao, Andrew Subject: FW: Apple v. Samsung: - Follow-Up on Issue of Patent License Negotiations exhibit FF From: Walden, S. Calvin Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 9:06 PM To: WH Apple Samsung NDCal Discovery Team Subject: FW: Apple v. Samsung: - Follow-Up on Issue of Patent License Negotiations E-mail to Quinn following up on issue of patent license negotiations. From: Walden, S. Calvin Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 12:04 AM To: 'Mazza, Mia'; Charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com; 'dianehutnyan@quinnemanuel.com'; 'rachelkassabian@quinnemanuel.com' Cc: AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple; Maselli, Samuel; Kolovos, Peter Subject: Apple v. Samsung: - Follow-Up on Issue of Patent License Negotiations Charlie, Rachel, and Diane, During Thursday's meeting, you asked whether Apple would be willing to narrow the scope of its requests for documents reflecting patent license negotiations by identifying particular technological areas or product lines. After conferring with our team, while we do not believe it is feasible to narrow our requests on a product line basis, we can further narrow the requests based on technological area: documents reflecting the negotiation of any license that includes any patent(s) that has been declared essential to ETSI and/or 3GPP. Please let us know by tomorrow morning whether Samsung agrees to make a complete production of negotiation documents in this category by January 23, 2012. In the event Samsung believes that the number of patent licenses falling into this category would make the production of documents reflecting their negotiation unduly burdensome, please provide a list of such licenses no later than tomorrow morning, and we will advise whether Apple would accept production of negotiation documents for only a subset of those licenses. Thanks, Calvin From: Mazza, Mia [mailto:MMazza@mofo.com] Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 7:56 PM To: Charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com Cc: AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple; Maselli, Samuel; Walden, S. Calvin; Kolovos, Peter Subject: Apple v. Samsung: Discovery Correspondence - Response to Samsung's Thursday Requests

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?