Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
602
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal re Samsung's January 10, 2012 Filings filed by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Trac Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 1/11/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG
12
Plaintiff,
13
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE
DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
vs.
14
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
16 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
18
Defendants.
19
20
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
21
Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) have filed Samsung’s Motion to
22
File Documents Under Seal relating to certain motions filed by Samsung on January 10, 2012.
23
Samsung has filed the declaration required under Civil L.R. 79-5 and General
24
Order No. 62 to provide evidence of good cause for this Court to permit filing under seal.
In
addition, Apple has filed the necessary declaration supporting Samsung’s motion to seal.
The
25
26
declarations establish that the below documents discuss or contain information that has been
27
28
02198.51855/4543801.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
-1-
1 designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY by Apple, or sealed by
2 order of this Court.
3
Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS that the following
4 documents shall be filed under seal:
5
1. Confidential portions of Samsung’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel Apple
6
to Produce Documents and Things; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in
7
Support Thereof;
8
a. Confidential portions of the Declaration of Diane C. Hutnyan in Support of
9
Samsung’s Motion to Compel Apple to Produce Documents and Things;
10
b. Exhibits A, B, D, J-Z, AA-CC of the Declaration of Diane C. Hutnyan in
11
Support of Samsung’s Motion to Compel Apple to Produce Documents and
12
Things;
13
2. Confidential portions of Samsung’s Renewed Motion to Compel Discovery
14
Relating to Mac OS 10.0; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support
15
Thereof;
16
a. Exhibits A-C of the Declaration of Diane C. Hutnyan in Support of
17
Samsung’s Renewed Motion to Compel Discovery Relating to Mac OS
18
10.0;
19
3. Confidential portions of Samsung’s Motion to Enforce Various Court Orders
20
Requiring the Production of Materials Relevant to Apple’s Asserted Design
21
Patents; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof;
22
a. Exhibits C, D, F and I of the Declaration of Diane C. Hutnyan in Support of
23
Samsung’s Motion to Enforce Various Court Orders Requiring the
24
Production of Materials Relevant to Apple’s Asserted Design Patents;
25
26
4. Confidential portions of Samsung’s Motion for Clarification Regarding the Court’s
December 22, 2011 Order (Dkt No. 535);
27
28
02198.51855/4543801.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
-2-
1
a. Confidential portions of the Declaration of Brett Arnold in support of
2
Samsung’s Motion for Clarification Regarding the Court’s December 22,
3
2011 Order (Dkt No. 535);
4
b. Exhibits A-J of the Declaration of Brett Arnold in Support of Samsung’s
5
Motion for Clarification Regarding the Court’s December 22, 2011 Order
6
(Dkt No. 535);
7
5. Samsung’s Notice of Motion and Motion for a Protective Order
8
a. Exhibits B-K of the Declaration of Diane C. Hutnyan in Support of
9
Samsung's Motion for a Protective Order
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13 DATED:
______________________
14
15
16
HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4543801.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?