Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
603
EXHIBITS re #602 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal re Samsung's January 10, 2012 Filings Exhibit 1 - [Proposed] Public Redacted Version of Samsung's Motion to Compel filed bySamsung Electronics Co. Ltd.(a Korean corporation). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Hutnyan Declaration, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N, #16 Exhibit O, #17 Exhibit P, #18 Exhibit Q, #19 Exhibit R, #20 Exhibit S, #21 Exhibit T, #22 Exhibit U, #23 Exhibit V, #24 Exhibit W, #25 Exhibit X, #26 Exhibit Y, #27 Exhibit Z, #28 Exhibit AA, #29 Exhibit BB, #30 Exhibit CC, #31 Proposed Order)(Related document(s) #602 ) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 1/11/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
16 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
18
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL
APPLE TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS
AND THINGS
Defendants.
19
20
On January 10, 2012, Defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics
21
America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”)
22
moved this court to compel discovery from Apple Inc.
Having reviewed the motion, for good
23
cause shown, the Court ORDERS as follows:
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4544000.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL APPLE TO PRODUCE
DOCUMENTS AND THINGS
1
The Court GRANTS Samsung’s Motion to Compel Apple to produce, by January 31,
2 2012, as detailed in Samsung’s Motion:
3
1.
all source code and other technical documents showing the operation of the
4 allegedly infringing product features, including all those corresponding to the baseband processors
5 incorporated in Apple’s products, as required by Patent Local Rule 3-4(a);
6
2.
all source code and other technical documents related to known prior art to the
7 asserted patents, as required by Patent Local Rule 3-2(a);
8
3.
all emails and documents showing Apple’s analysis and consideration of Samsung
9 and Samsung products, including those resulting from a reasonable search of documents for the
10 party (Samsung) and products at issue, and their aliases;
11
4.
all design history documents, including mechanical outlines (“MCOs”), prototypes,
12 whether complete or not, physical models, sketchbooks, and other documents relevant to the
13 validity of Apple’s design patents
14
5.
asserted trademark and trade dress rights.
all survey and marketing documents related to Apple's alleged design and utility
15 patents, trade dress, and trademarks; and
16
6.
all financial documents, relevant to showing the alleged value, or lack thereof, of
17 Apple’s asserted patents.
18
The Court also compels Apple to provide prompt deposition dates for all properly noticed
19 fact witnesses, including Mr. Ive, as well as for all of Samsung's 30(b)(6) deposition topics, by
20 January 22, 2012.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23 DATED:
______________________
24
25
26
HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
27
28
02198.51855/4544000.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL APPLE TO PRODUCE
DOCUMENTS AND THINGS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?