Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 606

EXHIBITS re #602 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal re Samsung's January 10, 2012 Filings Exhibit 3 - [Proposed] Public Redacted Version of Samsung's Motion for Clarification filed bySamsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit A-J, #3 Exhibit K, #4 Exhibit L, #5 Proposed Order)(Related document(s) #602 ) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 1/11/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
APPLE INC., a California corporation,

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG

12
Plaintiff,
13

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR
CLARIFICATION

vs.
14
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
16 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
18

Defendants.

19
20
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
21

Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) have filed Samsung's Motion for

22
Clarification Regarding The Court's December 22, 2011 Order (Dkt No. 535).

Having

23
considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, and good cause having been
24
shown, the Court hereby GRANTS Samsung's motion in its entirety.
25
26

Samsung’s expert Itay Sherman shall be permitted to view the following:
1. Exhibits used in the depositions of Apple’s design patent inventors that Apple

27
designated as confidential;
28
02198.51855/4543974.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

-1-

2. The deposition transcripts and declarations of Apple’s design experts that Apple

1
2

has designated as confidential, including any exhibits;

3

3. Any declarations from Apple’s design inventors, including exhibits;

4

4. Apple’s physical design models and prototypes, including photographs taken of

5

them;

6

5. Internal design team emails that relate to phone, music player, and tablet industrial

7
8

designs.
This order is without prejudice to Samsung’s ability to seek further relief regarding newly

9 produced design materials or categories of documents not addressed in this order.
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13 DATED:

______________________

14
15
16

Hon. Paul S. Grewal
United States Magistrate Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4543974.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

-2-