Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
619
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (Renewed) filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Cyndi Wheeler In Support of Apple's Renewed Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal, #2 Exhibit B to T. Briggs In Support of Samsung's Response to Apple's Opening Claim Construction, #3 Exhibit I to T. Briggs In Support of Samsung's Response to Apple's Opening Claim Construction, #4 Exhibit J to T. Briggs In Support of Samsung's Response to Apple's Opening Claim Construction, #5 Samsung's Response to Apple's Opening Claim Construction, #6 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Apple's Renewed Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal)(Hung, Richard) (Filed on 1/12/2012)
EXHIBIT J
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
Page 1
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NO. 11 CV 01846 LHK
2
3
4
5
APPLE, INC, a California
corporation,
6
Plaintiff,
7
vs.
8
9
10
11
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
a Korean business entity;
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
a New York corporation;
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
12
13
Defendants.
_________________________________________/
14
15
16
17
18
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
DEPOSITION OF JOSHUA STRICKON, PH.D.
Miami, Florida
Thursday, October 20, 2011
19
20
21
22
Reported by:
23
DARLINE MARIE WEST, RPR, FRP, CLR
24
Job No. 42680
25
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
877-702-9580
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
Page 5
1
P R O C E E D I N G S
2
3
VIDEO TECHNICIAN:
We are now on the video
4
record.
5
20th day of October, 2011.
6
videotape deposition of Joshua Strickon taken at
7
701 Brickell Ave., Suite 1650, Miami, Florida.
8
And it's taken in Case Number 11 CV 01846 LHK,
9
Apple, Inc. vs. Samsung Electronics Company,
10
11
The time is 9:16 a.m. on Thursday, the
We're here for the
Ltd., et al.
The case is filed in the United States
12
District Court, Northern District of California,
13
San Jose Division.
14
The court reporter is Darline West.
15
videographer is Sean Maguire, both with TSG
16
Reporting.
17
The
Will counsel and all present please
18
introduce yourself, and the court reporter will
19
swear the witness.
20
MS. DUCCA:
Marissa Ducca, Quinn
21
Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan in Washington,
22
D.C., for Samsung.
23
MR. BARQUIST:
Charles Barquist,
24
Morrison & Foerster for Dr. Strickon and
25
Apple.
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
877-702-9580
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
Page 6
1
THEREUPON,
2
JOSHUA STRICKON, PH.D.,
3
called as a witness on behalf of the Defendants
4
herein, having been first duly sworn, was examined
5
and testified as follows:
6
THE WITNESS:
7
8
9
10
I do.
DIRECT EXAMINATION
BY MS. DUCCA:
Q.
Good morning, Dr. Strickon.
How are you
today?
11
A.
Okay.
12
Q.
Will you please state your full name on
13
14
15
address for the record.
A.
Joshua Andrew Strickon.
901 Brickell Key
Boulevard, Apartment 805, Miami, Florida, 33131.
16
Q.
Dr. Strickon, have you been deposed before?
17
A.
Yes.
18
Q.
How many times?
19
A.
Once.
20
Q.
When was that?
21
A.
This past summer.
22
Q.
Do you recall what case that was in?
23
A.
Motorola and Apple.
24
25
MS. DUCCA:
I'm going to mark as
Exhibit 780 a document with Bates numbers
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
877-702-9580
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
Page 165
1
plastics?
2
MR. BARQUIST:
3
THE WITNESS:
Calls for a
legal conclusion.
4
Objection.
5
6
7
Repeat your question.
BY MS. DUCCA:
Q.
Does the glass member include PET and other
plastics?
8
MR. BARQUIST:
9
THE WITNESS:
Calls for a
legal conclusion.
10
Objection.
I believe in the
11
investigation and development of this
12
this product, that, yes, the glass member
13
would include PET and other plastics.
14
15
BY MS. DUCCA:
Q.
16
Are glass and plastic interchangeable?
17
MR. BARQUIST:
20
Objection to
form.
18
19
Objection.
THE WITNESS:
In what capacity?
BY MS. DUCCA:
Q.
Can
when you're building a prototype,
21
for example, would it
22
you would choose glass and plastic aside from, say,
23
cost, or can you use either interchangeably?
24
25
MR. BARQUIST:
speculation.
would there be reasons why
Objection.
Calls for
Calls for expert opinion
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
877-702-9580
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
Page 166
1
testimony.
2
3
4
5
Incomplete hypothetical.
THE WITNESS:
Glass and plastic have
different physical properties.
BY MS. DUCCA:
Q.
Okay.
So let's say you're building
you
6
were building a prototype and let's say you had a
7
piece of glass and a piece of plastic in front of
8
you, equal sizes.
9
Is there a reason you would choose the glass over the
10
Equal would fit in your prototype.
plastic?
11
MR. BARQUIST:
Objection.
12
expert opinion testimony.
13
Calls for
hypothetical.
14
15
16
17
18
THE WITNESS:
Incomplete
There may be, yes.
BY MS. DUCCA:
Q.
What are the benefits of using glass over
plastic?
MR. BARQUIST:
Objection.
19
expert opinion testimony.
20
Calls for
hypothetical.
21
THE WITNESS:
Incomplete
In my experience in using
22
these materials, glass can have better
23
chemical and scratch resistance than
24
similar types of plastic.
25
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
877-702-9580
than
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
Page 167
1
2
3
4
BY MS. DUCCA:
Q.
What are the benefits of using plastic over
glass?
A.
In my experience of using these materials,
5
plastic can often be lighter and more durable in the
6
sense that it's not as brittle as glass can be.
R
E
D
A
C
T
E
D
18
19
Q.
Now, if you look at Claim 11, would you
read Claim 11 and let me know when you're finished?
20
A.
Okay.
21
Q.
All right.
And Claim 11 recites dummy
22
features disposed in the space between the parallel
23
lines, correct?
24
A.
Yes.
25
Q.
I believe earlier that you testified that
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
877-702-9580
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
Page 168
1
this was one of the -- one of your contributions to
2
the patent, correct?
3
4
MR. BARQUIST:
7
8
Misstates
the testimony.
5
6
Objection.
THE WITNESS:
Is there a question?
BY MS. DUCCA:
Q.
I believe earlier you testified that this
was one of your contributions to the patent, correct?
9
MR. BARQUIST:
10
the testimony.
11
Objection.
Misstates
conclusion.
12
13
14
15
16
17
Calls for a legal
THE WITNESS:
Yeah.
That was one of
the ideas that I contributed to this work.
BY MS. DUCCA:
Q.
What are dummy features, as that term is
used in the '607 patent?
MR. BARQUIST:
18
THE WITNESS:
Calls for a
legal conclusion.
19
Objection.
In my work of what I
20
worked on internally at Apple, we referred
21
to dummy features as electrically isolated
22
segments that -- of uniform material that
23
was of the same material that the conductive
24
lines, rows and columns of the areas of -- I
25
don't recall.
Let me restate that.
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
877-702-9580
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?