Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 619

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (Renewed) filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Cyndi Wheeler In Support of Apple's Renewed Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal, #2 Exhibit B to T. Briggs In Support of Samsung's Response to Apple's Opening Claim Construction, #3 Exhibit I to T. Briggs In Support of Samsung's Response to Apple's Opening Claim Construction, #4 Exhibit J to T. Briggs In Support of Samsung's Response to Apple's Opening Claim Construction, #5 Samsung's Response to Apple's Opening Claim Construction, #6 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Apple's Renewed Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal)(Hung, Richard) (Filed on 1/12/2012)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT J Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE NO. 11 CV 01846 LHK 2 3 4 5 APPLE, INC, a California corporation, 6 Plaintiff, 7 vs. 8 9 10 11 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 12 13 Defendants. _________________________________________/ 14 15 16 17 18 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY DEPOSITION OF JOSHUA STRICKON, PH.D. Miami, Florida Thursday, October 20, 2011 19 20 21 22 Reported by: 23 DARLINE MARIE WEST, RPR, FRP, CLR 24 Job No. 42680 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 5 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 3 VIDEO TECHNICIAN: We are now on the video 4 record. 5 20th day of October, 2011. 6 videotape deposition of Joshua Strickon taken at 7 701 Brickell Ave., Suite 1650, Miami, Florida. 8 And it's taken in Case Number 11 CV 01846 LHK, 9 Apple, Inc. vs. Samsung Electronics Company, 10 11 The time is 9:16 a.m. on Thursday, the We're here for the Ltd., et al. The case is filed in the United States 12 District Court, Northern District of California, 13 San Jose Division. 14 The court reporter is Darline West. 15 videographer is Sean Maguire, both with TSG 16 Reporting. 17 The Will counsel and all present please 18 introduce yourself, and the court reporter will 19 swear the witness. 20 MS. DUCCA: Marissa Ducca, Quinn 21 Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan in Washington, 22 D.C., for Samsung. 23 MR. BARQUIST: Charles Barquist, 24 Morrison & Foerster for Dr. Strickon and 25 Apple. TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 6 1 THEREUPON, 2 JOSHUA STRICKON, PH.D., 3 called as a witness on behalf of the Defendants 4 herein, having been first duly sworn, was examined 5 and testified as follows: 6 THE WITNESS: 7 8 9 10 I do. DIRECT EXAMINATION BY MS. DUCCA: Q. Good morning, Dr. Strickon. How are you today? 11 A. Okay. 12 Q. Will you please state your full name on 13 14 15 address for the record. A. Joshua Andrew Strickon. 901 Brickell Key Boulevard, Apartment 805, Miami, Florida, 33131. 16 Q. Dr. Strickon, have you been deposed before? 17 A. Yes. 18 Q. How many times? 19 A. Once. 20 Q. When was that? 21 A. This past summer. 22 Q. Do you recall what case that was in? 23 A. Motorola and Apple. 24 25 MS. DUCCA: I'm going to mark as Exhibit 780 a document with Bates numbers TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 165 1 plastics? 2 MR. BARQUIST: 3 THE WITNESS: Calls for a legal conclusion. 4 Objection. 5 6 7 Repeat your question. BY MS. DUCCA: Q. Does the glass member include PET and other plastics? 8 MR. BARQUIST: 9 THE WITNESS: Calls for a legal conclusion. 10 Objection. I believe in the 11 investigation and development of this 12 this product, that, yes, the glass member 13 would include PET and other plastics. 14 15 BY MS. DUCCA: Q. 16 Are glass and plastic interchangeable? 17 MR. BARQUIST: 20 Objection to form. 18 19 Objection. THE WITNESS: In what capacity? BY MS. DUCCA: Q. Can when you're building a prototype, 21 for example, would it 22 you would choose glass and plastic aside from, say, 23 cost, or can you use either interchangeably? 24 25 MR. BARQUIST: speculation. would there be reasons why Objection. Calls for Calls for expert opinion TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 166 1 testimony. 2 3 4 5 Incomplete hypothetical. THE WITNESS: Glass and plastic have different physical properties. BY MS. DUCCA: Q. Okay. So let's say you're building you 6 were building a prototype and let's say you had a 7 piece of glass and a piece of plastic in front of 8 you, equal sizes. 9 Is there a reason you would choose the glass over the 10 Equal would fit in your prototype. plastic? 11 MR. BARQUIST: Objection. 12 expert opinion testimony. 13 Calls for hypothetical. 14 15 16 17 18 THE WITNESS: Incomplete There may be, yes. BY MS. DUCCA: Q. What are the benefits of using glass over plastic? MR. BARQUIST: Objection. 19 expert opinion testimony. 20 Calls for hypothetical. 21 THE WITNESS: Incomplete In my experience in using 22 these materials, glass can have better 23 chemical and scratch resistance than 24 similar types of plastic. 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 than Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 167 1 2 3 4 BY MS. DUCCA: Q. What are the benefits of using plastic over glass? A. In my experience of using these materials, 5 plastic can often be lighter and more durable in the 6 sense that it's not as brittle as glass can be. R E D A C T E D 18 19 Q. Now, if you look at Claim 11, would you read Claim 11 and let me know when you're finished? 20 A. Okay. 21 Q. All right. And Claim 11 recites dummy 22 features disposed in the space between the parallel 23 lines, correct? 24 A. Yes. 25 Q. I believe earlier that you testified that TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 168 1 this was one of the -- one of your contributions to 2 the patent, correct? 3 4 MR. BARQUIST: 7 8 Misstates the testimony. 5 6 Objection. THE WITNESS: Is there a question? BY MS. DUCCA: Q. I believe earlier you testified that this was one of your contributions to the patent, correct? 9 MR. BARQUIST: 10 the testimony. 11 Objection. Misstates conclusion. 12 13 14 15 16 17 Calls for a legal THE WITNESS: Yeah. That was one of the ideas that I contributed to this work. BY MS. DUCCA: Q. What are dummy features, as that term is used in the '607 patent? MR. BARQUIST: 18 THE WITNESS: Calls for a legal conclusion. 19 Objection. In my work of what I 20 worked on internally at Apple, we referred 21 to dummy features as electrically isolated 22 segments that -- of uniform material that 23 was of the same material that the conductive 24 lines, rows and columns of the areas of -- I 25 don't recall. Let me restate that. TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?