Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 633

OPPOSITION to ( #602 Samsung's MOTION for Clarification Regarding the Court's December 22, 2011 Order re Samsung's January 10, 2012 Filings filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 1/17/2012) Modified text on 1/18/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,

14
15
16
17
18
19

v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,

Case No.

11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR
CLARIFICATION REGARDING
THE COURT’S DECEMBER 22,
2012 ORDER

Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION REGARDING DEC. 22, 2012 ORDER
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3094710

1

Defendant Samsung seeks “clarification” of the Court’s December 22, 2012 Order

2

concerning access by its expert, Itay Sherman, to material designated as confidential by Apple.

3

Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, Samsung’s Motion for

4

Clarification of the Court’s December 22, 2012 Order is DENIED.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated: January _____, 2012.

7
8
9

HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION CLARIFICATION REGARDING DEC. 22, 2012 ORDER
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3094710

1