Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 639

OPPOSITION to ( 598 MOTION for Protective Order Regarding Samsung's First Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Notice ) filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Chan, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Proposed Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 1/17/2012) Modified text on 1/18/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a 15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New 16 York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, 17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 18 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING SAMSUNG’S FIRST RULE 30(b)(6) DEPOSITION NOTICE Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -1[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 On January 10, 2012, Plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) moved for a protective order relieving 2 it of any obligation to respond to or comply with Samsung’s First 30(b)(6) Deposition Notice, 3 served to Apple on December 14, 2011. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“Samsung”) has 4 opposed the motion. 5 Having considered the briefs and the arguments of the parties, the Court finds that Apple 6 has not shown good cause for the entry of a protective order, and hereby DENIES Apple’s motion 7 for a protective order in its entirety. Apple shall identify its Rule 30(b)(6) designee(s) for the 8 topics listed in Samsung’s Notice within five calendar days of the date of this Order, and shall 9 make the witness(es) available for deposition on mutually agreeable dates on or before March 1, 10 2012. 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 DATED: ___________, 2012 15 16 17 The Honorable Paul S. Grewal United States Magistrate Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -2[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?