Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 65

Declaration of Erik Olson in Support of #64 Reply to Opposition/Response to Samsung's Motion to Compel Apple to Produce Reciprocal Expedited Discovery filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Related document(s) #64 ) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 6/10/2011)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
2 [e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
3 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
5 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
[e-mail]
6 Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
[e-mail]
th
7 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5 Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
8 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
9
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
10 [e-mail]
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
11 Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
12 Facsimile: [phone]
13 Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
14 AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION

18 APPLE INC., a California corporation,
19
20

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK

Plaintiff,
vs.

21 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
22 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
23 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
24
Defendants.
25

DECLARATION OF ERIK OLSON IN
SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO
COMPEL APPLE TO PRODUCE
RECIPROCAL EXPEDITED
DISCOVERY

26
27
28
02198.51855/4191461.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
DECLARATION OF ERIK OLSON IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO
COMPEL APPLE TO PRODUCE RECIPROCAL EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

1

I, Erik Olson, declare:

2

1.

I am an attorney in the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP,

3 counsel for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
4 Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively “Samsung”).

I have personal knowledge of the

5 facts set forth in this declaration and, if called upon as a witness, I could and would testify to such
6 facts under oath.
7

2.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of an e-mail that I sent to

8 Jason R. Bartlett, of Morrison & Foerster LLP, counsel for Apple, Inc., on June 6, 2011.
9

3.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of a document entitled

10 “Patent Local Rule 2-2 Interim Model Protective Order,” which was attached to my June 6 e-mail
11 to Mr. Bartlett.
12

4.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of a document entitled

13 “Stipulated Modification to Patent L.R. 2-2 Interim Model Protective Order for Purposes of
14 Expedited Discovery,” which was attached to my June 6 email to Mr. Bartlett.
15

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed in San

16 Francisco, California on June 10, 2011.
17
18
19
20

By /s/ Erik Olson
Erik Olson

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4191461.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-1DECLARATION OF ERIK OLSON IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO
COMPEL APPLE TO PRODUCE RECIPROCAL EXPEDITED DISCOVERY